Eric L. Clay

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit circuit Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 27 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Juana Villegas v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville
709 F.3d 563 · 2013-03-04
Appeal (appellant (defendant Metropolitan Government)) Granted

“On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment to Plaintiff as to liability on both her shackling and denial-of-breast-pump claims. ... For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court's grant of summary judgment to Plaintiff and REMAND for further proceedings.”

Mark Laster v. City of Kalamazoo
746 F.3d 714 · 2014-03-13
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Laster)) Granted in part

“we agree with the district court's conclusion that Plaintiff has not established that he was constructively discharged ... However, we find that the district court improperly analyzed -- and improperly dismissed -- Plaintiffs Title VII retaliation claim. ... For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings.”

Pamela Gillie v. Law Office of Eric A. Jones
785 F.3d 1091 · 2015-05-08
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff debtors Gillie and Meadows)) Granted

“For the reasons set forth below, we VACATE the summary judgment in favor of Defendants and REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

DeShawn Anderson-Santos v. Kent County, Michigan
No. 23-1259 · 2024-02-29
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”

Product Solutions International, Inc. v. Aldez Containers, LLC
No. 21-2952 · 2022-08-22
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. James H. Griffith, Jr.
No. 21-6088 · 2022-09-21
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“For these reasons, we REVERSE the district court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment and REMAND with instructions to grant Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of copyright standing and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Jeffrey Capen v. Saginaw County, Michigan
No. 23-1665 · 2024-06-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment to Defendants.”

Alison Kareem v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
No. 23-3330 · 2024-03-14
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Therefore, we REVERSE the grant of summary judgment to Defendants for lack of standing and REMAND to the district court for further proceedings.”

Avantax Wealth Management, Inc. v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.
No. 23-5880 · 2024-07-12
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For those reasons, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment to Avantax.”

Frederick Grainger, Jr. v. Ottawa County, Michigan
No. 23-1230 · 2024-01-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, the district court's denial of Behovitz's motion to intervene as of right and permissively is AFFIRMED.”

Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. v. U.S. Nursing Corporation
No. 21-5994 · 2023-05-18
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, this Court AFFIRMS the district court's order denying a new trial.”

Nissan North America, Inc. v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.
No. 22-5469 · 2024-02-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court's order granting summary judgment to Continental.”

Put Judge Clay's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Clay actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Clay's own signed orders and cites them.