Susan M. Brnovich

How Judge Brnovich rules, drawn from 12 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2018-10-23
ABA rating
Unanimously Well Qualified
Education
University of Wisconsin-Madison (BBA, Spanish & business administration); University of Wisconsin-Madison (M.S., finance); University of Wisconsin-Madison (J.D.)
Signed orders read
12

How Judge Brnovich decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Holds FLSA claims barred by the Railway Labor Act air-carrier exemption where the work is traditionally performed by airline employees, even for a remote worker.

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Defendant American Airlines, Inc. Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 17). The Motion is granted as to Counts I, II and IV, which are each dismissed without prejudice. The Motion is denied as to Count III.”

Procedural preferences

On motions to dismiss, applies differentiated prejudice claim-by-claim, dismissing federal claims without prejudice under Rule 12(b)(1) while dismissing time- or statute-barred state claims with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6).

“IT IS ORDERED granting MV's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Plaintiff's federal discrimination and retaliation claims (Counts Two and Three) without prejudice under Rule 12(b)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Plaintiff's state law discrimination and wrongful termination/retaliation claims (Count One) with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Plaintiff's defamation claim (Count Four) without prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff leave to amend Count Four of his original Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order.”

Cautions

Treats claims a plaintiff fails to defend in opposition as abandoned under Local Rule 7.2(i) and grants summary judgment on them.

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. 51.) is granted in part and denied in part as explained above.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Daw v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
3:19-cv-08212-PCT-SMB
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 16), is denied and ONHIR's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 20), is granted.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted
Abdulhussain v. MV Public Transportation Incorporated
2:22-cv-01458-PHX-SMB
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED granting MV's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Plaintiff's federal discrimination and retaliation claims (Counts Two and Three) without prejudice under Rule 12(b)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Plaintiff's state law discrimination and wrongful termination/retaliation claims (Count One) with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Plaintiff's defamation claim (Count Four) without prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff leave to amend Count Four of his original Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order.”

Bailey v. P.B. Bell Asset Management Incorporated
2:19-cv-01761-PHX-SMB
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. 51.) is granted in part and denied in part as explained above.”

Lande v. Intel Corporation
2:23-cv-00946-PHX-SMB
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 45).”

Ardalan v. NAU School of Nursing et al
2:24-cv-02429-PHX-SMB
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed with leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.”

Hartwig v. American Airlines Group Incorporated
2:23-cv-00696-PHX-SMB
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Defendant American Airlines, Inc. Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 17). The Motion is granted as to Counts I, II and IV, which are each dismissed without prejudice. The Motion is denied as to Count III.”

Cox v. CoinMarketCap OpCo LLC
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court grants BAM's and CMC's Motions.”

Kumpers Composites GmbH & Co KG v. TPI Composites Inc.
Summary judgment (cross-motions) Granted in part

“The Court will grant in part and deny in part the parties' respective Motions (Doc. 78; Doc. 81).”

Cooper v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED affirming the December 1, 2023 decision of the ALJ.”

Early Warning Services LLC v. Johnson
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“reviewing the briefing and the relevant case law, the Court will deny the Motion.”

Xfinity Mobile v. Globalgurutech LLC
Motion for voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Granted in part

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs'”

East v. County of Riverside
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“jurisdiction (Doc 43.) is granted with prejudice.”

Draft for Judge Brnovich with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Brnovich, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Brnovich's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace