Stephen M. McNamee

How Judge McNamee rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
George H. W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
June 4, 1990
Education
University of Cincinnati, B.A. (1964); University of Arizona, M.A. (1967); University of Arizona College of Law, J.D. (1969)
Signed orders read
17

About Judge McNamee

Stephen M. McNamee is a senior judge of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. President George H. W. Bush appointed him, and he received his commission on June 4, 1990. He served as chief judge from 1999 to 2006 and took senior status on October 1, 2007.

Judge McNamee's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge McNamee's own (checked October 9, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Muhammad v. Arizona Department of Corrections
2:11-cv-01890-SMM · 2014-07-30
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Relief, filed September 26, 2013 (Doc. 37) is DENIED as moot.”

Class certification (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, filed November 29, 2013 (Doc. 46) is DENIED as moot.”

Muhammad v. Arizona Department of Corrections
2:11-cv-01890-SMM · 2014-07-31
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Ams’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 67), construed as a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, and the Motion is denied.”

Muhammad v. Arizona Department of Corrections
2:11-cv-01890-SMM · 2015-04-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Ams’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 90) is denied without prejudice.”

Muhammad v. Arizona Department of Corrections
2:11-cv-01890-SMM · 2015-05-19
Motion to enforce settlement (plaintiff) Denied

“the Complaint/motion is denied.”

Energy Enhancement System, LLC v. Kaufmann
2:12-cv-02440-SMM · 2014-01-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“denying as moot Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 42.)”

Gage v. Mayo Clinic
2:22-cv-02091-SMM · 2023-05-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 15).”

Gage v. Mayo Clinic
2:22-cv-02091-SMM · 2023-12-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 25).”

Jimenez v. Carroll
2:24-cv-03487-ASB · 2025-04-04
Application to proceed in forma pauperis (plaintiff) Denied

“denying Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Doc. 2).”

Default judgment (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgement as moot. (Doc. 9).”

Southwest Heritage Bank v. Coury
2:25-cv-00047-SMM · 2025-07-10
Motion to set aside default (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants’ Motion to Set Aside Default. (Doc. 23).”

Southwest Heritage Bank v. Coury
2:25-cv-00047-SMM · 2025-11-17
Motion for stipulated judgment (joint) Granted

“the Court grants the parties’ Motion for Entry of Stipulated Judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement. (Doc. 35).”

Guardado Lopez v. Air Pro Heating & Cooling LLC
2:25-cv-02009-SMM · 2026-02-25
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Denied

“denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs without prejudice. (Doc. 18).”

Southwest Heritage Bank v. Coury
2:25-cv-00047-SMM · 2026-02-18

The court rejected a recommendation as moot after the plaintiff sought to amend its complaint; this order decided no motion.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The inspected matters include mortgage, labor, and other civil disputes. This small selected sample cannot establish the judge’s overall caseload mix.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years1
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202601
Sep 202521
Mar 202510
Sep 202420
Mar 202401
Sep 202301
Mar 202302
Sep 202203
Mar 202205
Sep 202105
Mar 202104
Sep 202032

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Arizona, not for Judge McNamee: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed2,4856 months
Closed with no court action1352.2 months
Closed before pretrial2,0015.2 months
Closed during or after pretrial33515.2 months
Closed during trial1432.4 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20252,4856 months
Sep 20242,2786.7 months
Sep 20232,1268.3 months
Sep 20222,1819.4 months
Sep 20213,85720.9 months
Sep 20208,12812.2 months
Sep 20192,8429.6 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge McNamee with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge McNamee, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge McNamee's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace