Raner Christercunean Collins

How Judge Collins rules, drawn from 12 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
August 3, 1998
Education
Arkansas Polytechnic College, B.A. (1973); University of Arizona College of Law, J.D. (1975)
Signed orders read
12

About Judge Collins

Raner Christercunean Collins is a senior judge of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. President Bill Clinton appointed him, and he received his commission on August 3, 1998. He served as the court’s chief judge from 2013 to 2018 and took senior status in 2019.

Judge Collins's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Collins, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Discovery

If a discovery dispute remains unresolved after meeting, notify the judge’s law clerk by telephone.

“If a discovery dispute arises which cannot be resolved by the parties, the parties shall notify the Judge’s Law Clerk by telephone at (520) 205-4540.”

Conferences

Submit a brief joint settlement status report by the date set in the case management order and every 90 days afterward.

“Counsel shall submit to the Court a brief Joint Settlement Status Report on or before *DATE* and every 90 days thereafter.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Sundby v. Johnson
4:19-cv-00107-RCC · 2020-02-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Susan Johnson’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s Motion to File Second Amended Complaint is DENIED.”

Cattanach v. Maricopa County Community College District
4:22-cv-00572-RCC · 2023-03-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant MCCCD's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

Aguilar v. Thornell
4:23-cv-00264-RCC · 2024-07-22
Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time for Seeking Leave to Move to Join Additional Parties or to Amend Pleadings is DENIED.”

Motions to compel (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Discovery is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions in Deterring Future Misconduct and the Denial of Disclosure and Discovery by Opposing Counsel is DENIED.”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions from Inadequate Response to Interrogatories is DENIED.”

Motion to determine sufficiency of admissions (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Determination of Sufficiency of Defendant Perko's Response to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Motion to appoint counsel (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel to Assist with the Limited-Purpose of Discovery is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Motion for leave to amend (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion to Amend or Correct Answer to Amended Complaint is GRANTED.”

Aguilar v. Thornell
4:23-cv-00264-RCC · 2024-08-09
Motion for leave to depose (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Depose Witnesses is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to Disclose Witness List is GRANTED.”

Motion for leave to depose (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Undertake Officer Escalera’s Deposition via Written Questions is GRANTED.”

Motion for witness list disclosure (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s Motion of Plaintiff’s Avoidal [sic] in Disclosure of Witness List to Opposing Counsel via Mailbox Rule is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge Time for Completion of Discovery is GRANTED.”

Motions to stay (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion to Stay the Proceedings and Deadlines Set in Scheduling Order is DENIED.”

Nero v. Tiffany & Bosco PA
4:24-cv-00518-RCC · 2025-03-18
Motion for tro (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. (Doc. 7.)”

Motion to vacate and enter summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s Demand to Vacate Order of Dismissal and Enter Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Doc. 8.)”

Johnson v. Target
4:23-cv-00580-RCC · 2024-02-13
Application to proceed in forma pauperis (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff Alexander Johnson's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. (Doc. 2.)”

Johnson v. Target
4:23-cv-00580-RCC · 2024-07-29
Motion to set aside judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) is DENIED. (Doc. 11.)”

Valencia v. Shinn
4:21-cv-00335-RCC · 2022-06-14
Motion for leave to reply (petitioner) Granted

“GRANTING Petitioner's Motion to Reply to Respondents' Response to the Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 29.)”

Motions to strike (respondents) Denied

“DENYING Respondents' Motion to Strike ‘Petitioner's Addendum to his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 20.)”

Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Petitioner Gregory Nidez Valencia, Jr.'s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Non-Death Penalty) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Doc. 4.)”

Munoz v. 13 Custom Cabinets LLC
4:24-cv-00307-RCC · 2025-01-31
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“GRANTING Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 13).”

Munoz v. 13 Custom Cabinets LLC
4:24-cv-00307-RCC · 2025-03-19
Motion for attorneys fees (plaintiff) Granted in part

“this Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Against All Defendants (Doc. 17)”

Gomez v. Moreno
4:25-cv-00541-RCC · 2025-11-20
Application to proceed in forma pauperis (plaintiff Elizabeth Gomez) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ IFP applications are GRANTED.”

Application to proceed in forma pauperis (plaintiff Eugenio Gomez) Granted
Sereno v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
4:25-cv-00227-RCC · 2026-08-17
Social security appeal (plaintiff Nicole Sereno) Denied

“The Administrative Law Judge’s final decision is AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The inspected 2019 civil matters included habeas, prisoner civil-rights, Social Security, environmental, and insurance disputes. The selection favors older closed cases.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months2
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months1
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years4
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202624
Sep 202534
Mar 202526
Sep 202403
Mar 202433
Sep 202304
Mar 202301
Sep 202214
Mar 202204
Sep 202127
Mar 202114
Sep 202014

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Arizona, not for Judge Collins: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed2,4856 months
Closed with no court action1352.2 months
Closed before pretrial2,0015.2 months
Closed during or after pretrial33515.2 months
Closed during trial1432.4 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20252,4856 months
Sep 20242,2786.7 months
Sep 20232,1268.3 months
Sep 20222,1819.4 months
Sep 20213,85720.9 months
Sep 20208,12812.2 months
Sep 20192,8429.6 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Collins with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Collins, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Collins's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace