Lynnette C. Kimmins

United States District Court for the District of Arizona magistrate 5 signed orders read

How Judge Kimmins decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On habeas review, recommends denial where the claim is without merit.

“The Court finds the R&R is well-reasoned and adopts Judge Kimmins's findings and conclusions that the Petition should be denied because the claim is without merit. ... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition (Doc. 1) and dismissing this matter.”

Procedural preferences

In criminal cases, resolves motions to suppress on the specific record, recommending suppression where warranted and denial where not, and the district judge routinely adopts the recommendation.

“IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 72) is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 44) is granted.”

In products-liability cases, recommends granting summary judgment in part and denying it in part, analyzing each count individually.

“Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part as to Counts II, IV, XI, XII, and XV, and DENIED in part as to Counts I (to the extent based on a failure to warn), III, VI, VII, IX, X, XIII, and XIV (Doc. 55).”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Randolph Harvey
4:22-cr-00887-001-TUC-RM (LCK) · 2023-10-16
Motion to suppress (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 72) is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 44) is granted.”

United States v. Alan Tadeo Rabago
4:19-cr-00541-002-TUC-JGZ (LCK) · 2020-01-23
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Judge Kimmins' R&R (Doc. 143) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Amended First Motion to Suppress Statements (Doc. 127) is DENIED.”

Corey J. Thomas v. Hudson
4:24-cv-00451-TUC-JCH · 2025-08-26
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“The Court finds the R&R is well-reasoned and adopts Judge Kimmins's findings and conclusions that the Petition should be denied because the claim is without merit. ... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition (Doc. 1) and dismissing this matter.”

Diane Michelle Bailey v. Ethicon Incorporated
4:20-cv-00457-TUC-JAS (LCK) · 2021-09-14
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part as to Counts II, IV, XI, XII, and XV, and DENIED in part as to Counts I (to the extent based on a failure to warn), III, VI, VII, IX, X, XIII, and XIV (Doc. 55).”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part as to Counts I (to the extent based on design defect), and V, and DENIED in part as to Counts XVII and XVIII (Doc. 117).”

Keiron Bailey v. Arizona Board of Regents
4:23-cv-00557-TUC-AMM (LCK) · 2024-09-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“(1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (Doc. 29.) (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Doc. 18.) ... Claims 1, 2, and 5 as to the individual Defendants, and Claims 7, 10, 12, and 13 as to all Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Put Judge Kimmins's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Kimmins actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Kimmins's own signed orders and cites them.