John C. Hinderaker

How Judge Hinderaker rules, drawn from 10 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2020-09-29
Education
University of California, Santa Barbara (B.A., Business Economics, with honors, 1991); University of Arizona College of Law (J.D., magna cum laude, 1996)
Signed orders read
10

How Judge Hinderaker decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He denies a Rule 12(b)(6) motion where the contract claim is facially plausible and an affirmative defense (e.g. waiver) cannot be resolved on the pleadings.

“IT IS ORDERED DENYING Defendant Jeffery Shields's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14).”

Cautions

In Section 1983 false-arrest and unlawful-search cases he grants officers summary judgment on probable cause and qualified immunity where the arrest and search were valid.

“IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 58). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.”

In Title VII / ADEA employment-discrimination suits he grants the employer summary judgment in full where the plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case or show pretext.

“IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Gowan Milling Company, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 44). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter Judgment for the Defendant Gowan Milling Company, LLC and against the Plaintiff Maribel Zuniga.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Thornton v. Ethicon Incorporated et al
4:20-cv-00460-TUC-JCH
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29). Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on Counts II, III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, IX, XI, XII, XIII and XV and the portion of Counts I, X and XIV based on negligent failure to warn, and is otherwise DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 89). Count XVII is DISMISSED.”

Motion to limit testimony (unspecified) Moot / procedural

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE the motions seeking to limit case specific testimony (Docs. 31, 33). The parties may refile motions seeking to limit case specific testimony in light of the claims remaining as set forth in this Order.”

Padilla v. Bondi (Garland) et al
4:24-cv-00332-TUC-JCH
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15). Counts One and Two and this action are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly.”

Physics, Materials, and Applied Mathematics Research LLC v. Yeak et al
4:20-cv-00379-TUC-JCH
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party (Doc. 72.)”

United States v. Witt
4:23-cr-00389-TUC-JCH (EJM)
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING Defendant's Amended Motion to Suppress (Doc. 73).”

Motions to compel (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AFFIRMING Judge Markovich's Order (Doc. 113) denying Defendant's Motion to Compel or Dismiss Indictment.”

Hall v. Apodaca et al
4:25-cv-00139-TUC-JCH
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“(3) Granting Officers' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) and dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's state law claims for False Arrest and Imprisonment and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress against Defendants Antonio Apodaca, Jeffrey Glesinger, Jesse Giles, and Jennifer Hawkins.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Without good cause appearing, denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 34) and Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 49).”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied
Rule 56d discovery (plaintiff) Denied

“(2) Denying Plaintiff's Motion Under Rule 56(d) for Extension to Conduct Discovery (Doc. 48).”

Pfaendler v. Town of Sahuarita et al
4:20-cv-00188-TUC-JCH
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 58). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.”

Zuniga v. Gowan Milling Company LLC et al
4:21-cv-00243-TUC-JCH
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Gowan Milling Company, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 44). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter Judgment for the Defendant Gowan Milling Company, LLC and against the Plaintiff Maribel Zuniga.”

Thomas v. Shields et al
4:22-cv-00257-TUC-JCH
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED DENYING Defendant Jeffery Shields's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14).”

Christopher Karls Sisneros Estate et al v. NEWREZ LLC et al
4:24-cv-00553-TUC-JCH
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4).”

Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's request for a Temporary Restraining order and Plaintiff's request for Waiver of Fees (Doc. 1) is denied.”

United States v. Pricop
4:22-cr-02747-001-TUC-JCH (EJM)
Motion in limine (defendant) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion to Suppress Other Fires (Doc. 37).”

Grijalva v. ADP Screening and Selection Services Incorporated
4:22-cv-00206-TUC-JCH
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 27).”

Motion to certify class (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class (Doc. 26).”

Draft for Judge Hinderaker with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Hinderaker, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Hinderaker's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace