Eric J. Markovich
How Judge Markovich rules, drawn from 8 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Markovich decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
On a Rule 12(b)(2) personal-jurisdiction motion he resolves disputed jurisdictional facts in the plaintiff's favor on a prima facie showing, finding specific personal jurisdiction from purposeful direction (e.g. a generic employee handbook intended for all of a company's parks).
“Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 158) is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Get Air, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 97) is denied.”
Procedural preferences
On a motion to suppress a Border-Patrol investigatory stop he recommends denial where the totality (border proximity, an indirect route, a TECS alert, erratic driving) supplies reasonable suspicion, making credibility findings the district judge accepts on de novo review.
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING Defendant's Amended Motion to Suppress (Doc. 73).”
Cautions
In 28 U.S.C. 2241 habeas he holds that BOP individualized RRC-placement decisions are unreviewable under 18 U.S.C. 3625 and that First Step Act time credits do not compel transfer absent 3624(g) eligibility, recommending dismissal with prejudice.
“Magistrate Judge Eric Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43) is ACCEPTED. ... Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. 42) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Plaintiff's objections are rejected and the Report and Recommendation is adopted. ... (2) Defendants Pima County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Clarence Dupnik's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is granted. Defendant Pima County Sheriff's Office is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant Sheriff Clarence Dupnik is dismissed without prejudice.”
“(3) Defendants City of Tucson and Tucson City Attorney Michael Rankin's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is granted. Defendant Tucson City Attorney Michael Rankin is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant City of Tucson is dismissed without prejudice.”
“Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 158) is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Get Air, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 97) is denied.”
“Magistrate Judge Eric Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43) is ACCEPTED. ... Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. 42) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Injunctive and/or Declaratory Relief (Doc. 29) is DENIED.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING Defendant's Amended Motion to Suppress (Doc. 73).”
“Accordingly, it is recommended that the District Court revoke the defendant's supervised release.”
“For the reasons discussed above, the Court recommends that the District Court DENY the Motion to Sever (Doc. 3343).”
“the Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Judge enter an order REVERSING the Commissioner's decision and REMANDING for an award of benefits consistent with this opinion.”
“On February 4, 2026, Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich issued a Report and Recommendation (‘R&R’) recommending this Court grant Defendant Pima County’s Motion for Summary Judgment.”
Draft for Judge Markovich with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Markovich, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Markovich's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace