David Charles Bury

How Judge Bury rules, drawn from 15 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
March 19, 2002
Education
Oklahoma State University, B.S. (1964); University of Arizona College of Law, J.D. (1967)
Signed orders read
15

About Judge Bury

David Charles Bury is a senior judge of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. President George W. Bush appointed him to the court, and he received his commission on March 19, 2002. He took senior status on December 31, 2012.

Judge Bury's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Bury, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Trial

List every exhibit the party intends to offer at trial in the joint proposed pretrial order.

“Each party shall list the exhibits it intends to offer at trial.”

Trial

List every witness the party intends to call at trial in the joint proposed pretrial order.

“Each party shall list the witnesses it intends to call at trial.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors
4:18-cv-00186-DCB · 2020-04-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 46) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART”

Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors
4:18-cv-00186-DCB · 2022-01-03
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 104) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Pima County Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 135, 136) is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Federal Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 146) is GRANTED.”

Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors
4:18-cv-00186-DCB · 2022-03-10
Motions to stay (plaintiff) Granted

“the Motion to Stay (Doc. 192) is GRANTED”

Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
4:20-cv-00555-DCB · 2024-02-05
Motion to expand administrative record (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the motions asking the Court to expand the administrative record relevant to issues not reached herein (D Interv. (Docs. 104 (R); 122 (S) and Plaintiffs’ (Doc. 108) are DENIED AS MOOT.”

Motion to expand administrative record (plaintiff) Moot / procedural
Motions to strike (defendant) Denied

“the Motion to Strike (Doc. 173) Plaintiffs’ Statement of Material Facts (Docs. 156 (R); 167 (S)) is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the Crossmotion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 170 (R); 198 (S)) filed by the EPA is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 174 (R); 197 (S)) filed by Intervenor Defendants is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 155 (R); 167 (S)) filed by Plaintiffs is GRANTED.”

Alcozar-Murphy v. ASARCO Arizona Inc.
4:14-cv-02390-DCB · 2017-02-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“both motions for summary judgment (Docs. 62, 64) are GRANTED in favor of both Defendants and against Plaintiff.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted
Mixon v. United States Bureau of Prisons
4:16-cv-00260-DCB · 2017-02-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED.”

McBeath v. Tucson Tamale Company
4:16-cv-00462-DCB · 2017-02-21
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Denied

“the Court denies the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and grants the Motion to Amend the Complaint.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 25) is GRANTED.”

Fisher v. Tucson Unified School District
4:74-cv-00090-DCB · 2016-12-27

In school desegregation oversight, the court adopted the special master's reports, declined to find noncompliance with the intervention plan, and directed further monitoring.

Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Forest Service
4:20-cv-00020-DCB · 2020-03-11
Motion to intervene (third-party (proposed intervenor)) Denied

“The Court denies him intervention.”

Motions to dismiss (third-party (proposed intervenor)) Moot / procedural

“As a non-party he may not seek dismissal of the action. ... IT IS ORDERED that Daniel Gabino Marines is denied intervention in this action and the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is DENIED.”

Lopez v. United States of America
4:21-cv-00255-DCB · 2023-04-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED.”

Lopez v. United States of America
4:21-cv-00255-DCB · 2024-03-14
Motions to strike (defendant) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Strike (Doc. 37) is GRANTED.”

Espinoza v. Irby
4:17-cv-00236-DCB · 2018-09-11
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel access to SSU and STG files (Doc. 30) is DENIED.”

Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of time to file the Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 36) is GRANTED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The nine sampled civil dockets include prisoner civil-rights and habeas matters, a medical-malpractice claim, contract and motor-vehicle disputes, and a property case. The selection is narrow and closed-case weighted.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202402
Sep 202331
Mar 202301
Sep 202201
Mar 202233
Sep 202108
Mar 202108
Sep 202006

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Arizona, not for Judge Bury: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed2,4856 months
Closed with no court action1352.2 months
Closed before pretrial2,0015.2 months
Closed during or after pretrial33515.2 months
Closed during trial1432.4 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20252,4856 months
Sep 20242,2786.7 months
Sep 20232,1268.3 months
Sep 20222,1819.4 months
Sep 20213,85720.9 months
Sep 20208,12812.2 months
Sep 20192,8429.6 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Bury with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Bury, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Bury's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace