Angela M. Martinez

United States District Court for the District of Arizona district Appointed by Joe Biden (Democratic) 5 signed orders read

How Judge Martinez decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Fair Credit Reporting Act cases, treats inaccuracy as the threshold element; where the plaintiff cannot show the reported information was inaccurate or materially misleading, grants the defendant summary judgment without reaching the remaining elements.

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. 45.) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgement in favor of Defendant Experian ... and close the file in this case.”

Procedural preferences

Will defer summary judgment, denying the motion without prejudice, to allow a party's needed Rule 56(d) discovery.

“(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Doc. 28.)”

Cautions

Conducts an independent, de novo Speedy Trial Act analysis rather than rubber-stamping a recommendation, denying dismissal after computing the excludable time.

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial is DENIED. (Doc. 66.)”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Lovelady v. General Business Recoveries Incorporated (Experian Information Solutions)
4:23-cv-00136-TUC-AMM
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. 45.) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgement in favor of Defendant Experian ... and close the file in this case.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Crystal Lovelady's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Doc. 47.)”

Netrition Incorporated v. Tyler's Coffee LLC
4:23-cv-00363-TUC-AMM
Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Doc. 28.)”

Motion for discovery (plaintiff) Granted

“(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Discovery is GRANTED. (Doc. 35.)”

Bailey v. Arizona Board of Regents
4:23-cv-00557-TUC-AMM (LCK)
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Doc. 18.) (3) Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. ... Claims 1, 2, and 5 as to the individual Defendants, and Claims 7, 10, 12, and 13 as to all Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

United States v. Balda
4:24-cr-01182-001-TUC-AMM (MAA)
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial is DENIED. (Doc. 66.)”

Robbins v. Pima, County of
4:23-cv-00362 · 2026-03-31
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Pima County's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. (Doc. 49.) Robbins's Equal Protection and Due Process claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Claims III and IV) are DISMISSED.”

Put Judge Martinez's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Martinez actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Martinez's own signed orders and cites them.