Susan Bronwyn Owens Hickey

United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas district Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 18 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Cline v. Munasib
1:23-cv-01009-SOH · 2024-03-18
Motion for voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) should be and hereby is GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE,”

Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 13) are hereby DENIED as MOOT.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Moot / procedural
Stovall v. Brotherton
6:23-cv-06115-SOH-MEF · 2025-01-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) hereby is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's official capacity claim, claim for compensatory damages, and request for relief in the form of parole are DISMISSED. Defendant's motion is denied in all other respects.”

Chambers v. Watson
6:18-cv-06091-SOH · 2020-03-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“the Clark County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Separate Defendant Tommy Waldron's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Guirlando v. Ouachita County
1:21-cv-01015-SOH-BAB · 2022-12-05

In a pro se Section 1983 prisoner suit, Hickey dismissed sua sponte under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) for failure to prosecute and comply with court orders after the plaintiff ignored multiple deadlines and an order to show cause. She did not reach the defendants' pending summary-judgment motions. Magistrate Judge Barry A. Bryant was assigned.

Hauptmann v. Cox
4:23-cv-04075-SOH · 2024-02-02

In a pro se Section 1983 prisoner suit, Hickey dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) and Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) for failure to prosecute after the plaintiff ignored the deadline to respond to a defense exhaustion-only summary-judgment motion and an order to show cause. She applied the Rodgers factors and declined the harsher with-prejudice dismissal because little had been expended on discovery. The court did not reach the defense motion.

United States v. Sullivan
4:22-cr-40001-SOH · 2022-12-20
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Indictment as to Stephen Haden Sullivan is DISMISSED.”

Wilson v. Kelly
6:19-cv-06073-SOH · 2021-05-19
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Based on the order entered today, judgment is entered DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The relief sought is denied. The certificate of appealability is denied.”

United States v. Ward
6:18-cr-60026-SOH · 2023-03-31
Motion for compassionate release (defendant) Denied

“the Court finds that Defendant's Motion for Compassionate Release (ECF No. 45) and Supplemental Motion to Reduce Sentence (ECF No. 49) should be and hereby are DENIED.”

United States v. Nutt
6:20-cr-60005-SOH · 2026-05-19
Motion for sentence reduction (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence (ECF No. 55) should be and hereby is DENIED.”

Jones v. Payne
6:22-cv-06110-SOH · 2023-02-23
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“the Court ADOPTS IN PART Judge Bryant's R&R (ECF No. 10). Jones's petition (ECF No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Motion for leave to amend (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“Finally, because the Court dismisses Jones's petition with prejudice, Jones's request to amend that petition (ECF No. 14) is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Jenkins v. RBIS, LLC
4:23-cv-04059-SOH-MEF · 2025-03-19
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's request that the fluctuating workweek method be applied to any calculation of pay rate is granted. All of Defendant's other requests for relief are denied.”

Turner v. Concentrix Services US, Inc.
1:18-cv-01072-SOH · 2019-09-09
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the Court finds that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class and Collective Action Claims (ECF No. 9) should be and hereby is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Nine terminated cases filed in 2022 provide a non-random duration sample. The median is roughly 1.3 to 1.5 years; the longest, CCRD Global, ran 825 days, while Weaver terminated after 118 days.

Put Judge Hickey's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Hickey actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Hickey's own signed orders and cites them.