Robert Toombs Dawson

United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas district Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 24 signed orders read

How Judge Dawson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Will not weigh credibility or resolve a disputed intent question at summary judgment, even where the movant calls its explanation the 'only logical' one.

“For the Court to determine the veracity of Mancilla's statements ... would require the Court to judge the evidence and its weight, which is an impermissible step at summary judgment.”

Procedural preferences

Reviews magistrate R&Rs de novo when a party files written objections (clear-error/adopt-in-toto only when unopposed), and will adopt an R&R that splits a multi-claim MSJ rather than granting it wholesale.

“The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety.”

Cautions

Applies qualified immunity rigorously in employment/Section 1983 suits: a lateral transfer keeping the same pay and title is not a constructive discharge, and absent a clearly-established violation the individual defendants get immunity.

“Viewing these allegations in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the Court cannot conclude that Plaintiff was constructively discharged from his employment.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Tryon v. Dyke
2:05-cv-02169-RTD · 2007-01-16
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

United States v. Contents of First Community Bank / Bank of the Ozarks Accounts
2:04-cv-02267-RTD · 2007-03-06
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

Wright v. Tucker
6:05-cv-06034-BAB · 2007-02-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 23) is denied.”

Gleghorn v. Melton
6:04-cv-06060-RTD · 2007-05-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons stated, Defendants' motion for summary judgment should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1985 and for declaratory relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Jones v. Allen
2:06-cv-02051-RTD · 2007-09-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims that he was provided an inadequate diet and his meals were served in an unsanitary environment. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claim that his First Amendment rights were violated when he was denied access to newspapers or other media sources containing news coverage.”

Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr. v. Major Andrew Ruh, Deputy Warden White, and Sergeant Harrison
6:20-cv-06018 · 2020-11-05
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“1. The Renewed Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED IN PART and Plaintiff’s official capacity claims are hereby dismissed; 2. the motion is DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS; and 3. Plaintiff’s individual capacity claims remain before the Court.”

Jose P. Mancilla, Sr. and Hortencia H. Mancilla v. Miki Molnar, Paul Smith, Wes Hearon, and John Ashcroft (and successor Alberto R. Gonzales)
2:05-cv-02097 · 2005-11-22

Purely procedural order granting plaintiffs leave to file their answer to a motion to dismiss under seal; not a ruling on the merits of the underlying motion to dismiss, so excluded from dispositive-motion stats.

Numed Technologies, Inc. v. Tim R. Fidler and Fidmed, LLC
5:06-cv-05033 · 2006-06-21
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“In accordance with the plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (#22), and being well and sufficiently advised in the premises, the Court finds that this matter should be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.”

David Leroy Hill, Jr. v. Jail Administrator Sarah Haney, Sheriff Travis Hill, and Michael Brown
6:21-cv-06101 · 2021-11-09
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Gregory Brewer v. Chief Holt, Captain Mel Steed and Lt. Gary Ashcraft
6:07-cv-06018 · 2007-07-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, the motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) filed by Lt. Gary Ashcraft is GRANTED, and he is DISMISSED as a defendant in this action.”

Diana Payne v. The University of Arkansas Fort Smith, Joel Stubblefield, and Sandi Sanders
2:04-cv-02189 · 2006-07-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s gender discrimination claims under Title VII and the EPA and retaliation claim under Title VII is DENIED. Summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim and substantive/procedural due process claims is GRANTED and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group, Inc., Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, and Safelite Autoglass, Inc.
2:05-cv-02072 · 2006-11-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A separate judgment will be entered accordingly.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Ten terminated cases from 2021 and 2022 provide a non-random duration sample. Several contested cases ended by settlement or stipulated dismissal rather than a merits ruling. The available records support only limited dispositive-motion timing, including the Nunnelee recommendation adoption described below.

Put Judge Dawson's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Dawson actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Dawson's own signed orders and cites them.