Paul Kinloch Holmes III

How Judge Holmes rules, drawn from 32 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Position
district
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2011-02-08
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
Westminster College (B.A., 1973); University of Arkansas School of Law (J.D., 1978)
Signed orders read
32

How Judge Holmes decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Build the summary-judgment record before the recommendation issues. In a detainee medical-care case, the court declined to consider evidence first supplied with objections when the defendant had not explained why it was omitted earlier.

“it [is] under no obligation to permit a party to fix its own errors in compiling the summary judgment record.”

Cautions

A Section 2255 motion should not simply repackage an issue already litigated on direct appeal. In one criminal case, the court held that the guilty-plea issue was barred for that reason and independently rejected the ineffective-assistance claim on the merits.

“Defendant’s motion to vacate (Doc. 62) is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Truong Son Market, Inc. v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
2:21-cv-02058-PKH · 2021-09-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 23) is DENIED.”

P.A.M. Transport Inc. v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc. (Diamond Pet Foods)
5:23-cv-05002-PKH · 2023-03-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Schell & Kampeter, Inc. d/b/a Diamond Pet Foods's motion to dismiss (Doc. 16) is DENIED.”

FS Southbrooke LP v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
2:21-cv-02120-PKH · 2022-04-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Nationwide's motion (Doc. 31) for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Southbrooke's Texas statutory claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Southbrooke's breach of contract claim, including its demand under Ark. Code Ann. 23-79-208, remains pending for trial.”

Motion to exclude expert (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Southbrooke's motion (Doc. 34) to exclude expert testimony is TERMINATED AS MOOT.”

Smith v. Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc.
2:20-cv-02158-PKH · 2021-10-21

FLSA/AMWA unpaid-overtime case. PATTERN (strong signal, but no party motion ruled on): after denying approval of a settlement the Court found to be 'the product of collusion', Holmes ordered the parties to show cause why SJ should not be entered for the plaintiff, then granted SJ to the plaintiff SUA SPONTE for $2.00 ($1 wages + $1 liquidated damages), holding the parties may not compromise a non-bona-fide FLSA-coverage dispute (citing D.A. Schulte v. Gangi). Recorded as an order read; excluded from party-motion stats because the SJ was entered on the Court's own initiative.

McGrath v. Phelps
2:22-cv-02003-PKH · 2023-07-20

In a pro se prisoner suit, Holmes adopted Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford's R&R over the plaintiff's objections and dismissed sua sponte under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute and comply with court orders. The plaintiff had not responded to the defense summary-judgment motion despite an extension, but the court did not reach that motion.

Schug et al. v. MCC Group Holdings, Inc. et al.
5:22-cv-05101-PKH · 2022-09-27
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion (Doc. 11) to dismiss and compel arbitration is GRANTED. The parties are ORDERED to submit this dispute to arbitration consistent with the terms of their arbitration agreement, and Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Freeman v. Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Poultry, Inc.
5:21-cv-05175-PKH · 2022-08-18
Motion to compel discovery (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Anthony Freeman’s motion to compel (Doc. 35) is DENIED without prejudice. The parties are directed to meet and confer in good faith regarding the issues raised therein, in light of the Court’s order earlier today granting in part and denying in part Mr. Freeman’s motion for certification.”

Immanuel Baptist Church of Rogers, Arkansas, Inc. v. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
5:21-cv-05208-PKH · 2022-08-18
Motion for protective order (defendant) Granted

“The parties seek protection of confidential, sensitive, or proprietary information. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will GRANT the motion and enter a revised protective order.”

Cheatwood v. Mwanza et al.
2:19-cv-02088-PKH · 2020-12-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Fort Smith HMA, LLC’s motion (Doc. 109) for summary judgment is GRANTED, and all claims against Defendant Fort Smith HMA, LLC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Horan’s motion (Doc. 112) for summary judgment and Dr. Mwanza’s motion (Doc. 102) for summary judgment are DENIED. Plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims against these two defendants remain pending for trial.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Kimbley v. Starr et al.
2:22-cv-02075-PKH · 2022-05-23
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Doc. 6) is DENIED.”

Advocacy Trust, LLC v. Kia Corporation et al.
5:21-cv-05064-PKH · 2023-03-31
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kia’s motions for summary judgment (Doc. 78), to exclude expert Kelly Kennett (Doc. 84), and to exclude expert Chris Caruso (Doc. 85) are DENIED. Advocacy Trust’s claims remain pending for trial.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Kia’s motion (Doc. 81) for partial summary judgment on Advocacy Trust’s claim for punitive damages is GRANTED.”

Motion to exclude expert (defendant) Denied
Motion to exclude expert (defendant) Denied
Doe v. University of Arkansas - Fayetteville
5:21-cv-05231-PKH · 2022-01-18
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 13) for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is DENIED IN PART. A ruling on Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction will be deferred until the proper Defendants have had the opportunity to respond.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Nine terminated cases filed in 2021 provide a non-random duration sample, with a median of roughly ten to twelve months. A newer terminated-case review adds motion outcomes from civil-rights and Social Security matters during Judge Holmes's senior service.

Draft for Judge Holmes with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Holmes, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Holmes's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace