Beverly Stites Jones

How Judge Jones rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Jones no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Position
Magistrate judge
Status
Retired
Education
University of Arkansas School of Law (J.D., 1981)
Signed orders read
28

About Judge Jones

Beverly Stites Jones served as a U.S. magistrate judge for the Western District of Arkansas until her retirement in the 2000s. She handled Social Security appeals by consent and issued reports and recommendations in referred civil matters. She earned her law degree from the University of Arkansas School of Law in 1981.

How Judge Jones decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Weeks, after a Social Security claimant obtained a sentence-four remand, she recommended an award of Equal Access to Justice Act fees.

“we recommend awarding plaintiff's attorney fees and costs under EAJA in the amount of $1,399.51.”

In Barnes, Jones enforced a signed housing-agency conciliation release after finding it covered the same allegations and had been entered knowingly and voluntarily. She then left any state claims to state court.

“We believe the release was entered into voluntarily and knowingly and that it bars Barnes from bringing the present lawsuit.”

Cautions

She gives the standard 10-day window for specific written objections and warns that only timely, specific objections trigger de novo district-court review; vague or late objections waive appeal of fact questions.

“The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.”

In Fenner, she found that self-representation and lack of legal knowledge did not justify extending the habeas filing deadline.

“pro se status and lack of legal knowledge, factors which are inadequate to warrant equitable tolling.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Weeks v. Barnhart
2:04-cv-02143-JLH · 2006-01-30
Eaja attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“we recommend awarding plaintiff's attorney fees and costs under EAJA in the amount of $1,399.51.”

Herrmann v. Barnhart
5:04-cv-05120-JLH-BSJ · 2005-09-15
Eaja attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“we recommend awarding plaintiff's attorney fees and costs under EAJA in the amount of $4,212.45.”

Hayes v. Eads Brothers Furniture Company
2:05-cv-02124 · 2006-11-01
Motion for attorney fees (defendant) Denied

“I recommend that the motion for attorney fees be denied.”

Nunley v. United States
5:02-cv-05199 · 2006-11-13
Motions to stay (defendant) Denied

“The motion to stay discovery (Doc. 72) is denied.”

Rains v. Barnhart
3:05-cv-03045 · 2006-06-07
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“recommend that the denial of benefits to plaintiff be reversed and this matter remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Bader v. Norris
5:05-cv-05175 · 2006-03-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Bader’s § 2254 petition is barred by limitations and should be dismissed with prejudice.”

Fenner v. Norris
5:06-cv-05029 · 2006-04-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“I recommend that this action be dismissed with prejudice on the ground it is barred by the one-year statute of limitations of the AEDPA.”

Meadows v. Barnhart
5:04-cv-05170 · 2005-09-23
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“we hereby reverse the decision of the ALJ and remand this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Edgmon v. Barnhart
2:04-cv-02192 · 2005-09-26
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“we hereby reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Reeder v. Barnhart
3:04-cv-03060 · 2005-09-29
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“the decision should be affirmed.”

Smith v. Barnhart
2:04-cv-02269 · 2005-11-29
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“we remand this case to the Commissioner for consideration of additional evidence pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Atchley v. Barnhart
3:04-cv-03072 · 2005-11-01
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“we hereby reverse the decision of the ALJ and remand this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The three sampled dockets comprise one prisoner civil rights matter and two Social Security fee matters. This small availability sample cannot establish a caseload mix.

A historical record

Judge Jones no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.