John Bruce

United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama district Retired 1901 · served 1875–1901 Appointed by Ulysses S. Grant (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Bruce no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Bruce decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He treated equal treatment as part of a common carrier's common-law duty when competing shippers sought substantially the same service under like conditions.

“no charge is reasonable lor one party that is not also reasonable for the other”

He used equity to reach allegedly fraudulent transfers when waiting for a judgment and execution would make the creditor's remedy ineffective.

“The absence of a complete and adequate remedy at law is tlie only test of equity jurisdiction.”

He enforced a bankrupt's contractual waiver of state-law exemptions when the creditor held more than a bare personal claim.

“the right both of bankrupt and creditor are to be kept in view”

Procedural preferences

He confined claim preclusion to matters actually presented and required the same evidence, declining to bar a later suit built on a materially different pledge theory.

“if different proof be required to sustain the two actions, a judgment in one of them is no bar to the other.”

He distinguished a vessel's home port from its enrollment port and looked to the owner's residence when ranking maritime liens.

“The solution of the question where her homo port is, when it arises, depends wholly upon the locality of her owner’s residence, and not upon the place of her enrollment.”

He rejected removal theories that depended on treating a state as a citizen and remanded where state procedure did not discriminate among classes of defendants.

“the case at bar is not one for removal”

Cautions

He expected shareholders seeking equitable relief to act diligently when public records and corporate information supplied the means to discover the challenged transaction.

“Nothing can call this court into activity but conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence”

He would grant a new trial when a verdict imposed corporate liability for an agent's criminal complaint outside the scope of the agent's employment.

“the motion for a new trial must prevail”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re O'Neal
· 1893-06-19

The court recognized newly commissioned federal officers for purposes of conducting the term without deciding the legality of their appointments in a quo warranto proceeding: “The new appointees to the offices of district attorney and marshal whose names are in the commissions they bear and present here are recognized on this hearing as the persons entitled to represent the United States in their respective offices.”

Orman v. North Alabama Development Co.
· 1892-09-28
Motion to dismiss attachment (defendant) Denied

“the motion to dismiss the attachment is denied.”

United States v. Godbold
· 1877-06-15
Demurrer to statute of limitations defense (United States) Granted

“The demurrer is sustained.”

United States v. Bridges
· 1879-10-15
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“overruling the motion for a new trial.”

Third National Bank v. Gordon
· 1892-06-06

The opinion analyzed whether judgment could be entered summarily against sureties on a supersedeas bond, but the retrieved text does not state the final disposition expressly. It explained that “the court is again in possession of the cause, with power to give such remedy as the plaintiff may be entitled to.”

United States v. Moore
· 1878-11-15
Demurrer to juror disqualification (defendant) Granted

“Demurrer sustained.”

In re Garden
· 1899-02-10
Motion to disallow exemptions (creditor) Granted

“The result of these reviews is that the order of the referee refusing the motion of the Birmingham Dry-Goods Company is reversed, and it is so ordered.”

Dimmick v. United States
· 1887-11-23
Official fee claim (plaintiff) Granted

“Judgment wi’l therefore be entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $682.55, with interest from date, together with the costs to be taxed.”

Bell v. United States
· 1887-11-25
Official fee claim (plaintiff) Granted

“Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $630.65, with interest from date, together with the costs to be taxed.”

Barber v. United States
· 1887-11-23
Official fee claim (plaintiff) Granted

“Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $995.35, with interest from date, together with the costs to be taxed.”

Gilmer v. Morris
· 1891-05-15
Plea of res judicata (defendants) Denied

“the former judgment in this case cannot be held to conclude the right of property to the stock in question, which is involved alike in both cases.”

The Alabama
· 1884-07-01
Exception to admiralty jurisdiction (claimants) Denied

“The result is that the exception to the jurisdiction of the court is overruled.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The located decisions span bankruptcy, admiralty, railroads, federal-officer compensation, corporate and creditor litigation, removal, election law, and criminal procedure. They do not establish the distribution of Bruce's full caseload.

A historical record

Judge Bruce no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.