Ira DeMent

How Judge DeMent rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge DeMent no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1992–2011
Appointed by
George H. W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
March 18, 1992
Education
University of Alabama, B.S., 1953; University of Alabama School of Law, J.D., 1958
Signed orders read
25

About Judge DeMent

Ira DeMent was a judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Appointed by President George H.W. Bush, Judge DeMent received a commission on March 18, 1992. Judge DeMent assumed senior status on April 15, 2002 and served until death on July 16, 2011.

How Judge DeMent decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He treated a later third-party complaint as irrelevant to jurisdiction when the original removal was proper and completely diverse.

“Latco’s third-party complaint is irrelevant for jurisdictional purposes”

He found substantially similar prior discrimination evidence probative despite the passage of time.

“particularly given the substantial similarities between the ‘prior bad acts’ evidence and the discrimination at issue in this case.”

Procedural preferences

He declined to decide damages questions that the moving party had not raised.

“The issue of whether on the facts of this case one of the damages requests is more appropriate than the other has not been raised and, therefore, is not addressed in this opinion.”

He expected counsel to begin document searches promptly when ownership changes made discovery predictably difficult.

“This is all the more reason why counsel should have begun searching for the documents with celerity.”

Cautions

He would not allow expert testing of a materially different product to carry a products-liability claim past summary judgment.

“Without this irrelevant testimony, Plaintiffs claim is supported only with speculation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Pickett v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Company
· 1996-03-25
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Granted

“this action be and the same is hereby remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama.”

Pinckard Vault & Marble Works v. King Lifts, Inc.
· 1999-04-20
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“this action be and the same is hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Pike County, Alabama”

Maricus W. ex rel. Marvin M. v. Lanett City Board of Education
· 2001-05-29
Motion to deny bill of costs (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiffs Motion To Deny Bill Of Costs be and the same is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Spellman v. Hopper
· 2000-04-20
First amendment claim (plaintiff) Granted

“the Department of Corrections’ absolute prohibition on prisoner’s receipt of subscription magazines and newspapers in administrative segregation in the Alabama prison system, formerly implemented through Administrative Regulation 433, violates the First Amendment”

KW Plastics v. United States Can Co.
· 2001-02-02
Motion in limine (plaintiff) Granted in part

“ED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Stanford v. Burlington Motor Carriers
· 1999-06-11
Objections to bill of costs (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ Objections be and the same are hereby SUSTAINED and Plaintiffs Bill of Costs be and the same is hereby STRICKEN.”

Tyree v. Harbor Freight Tools Co.
· 2001-06-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Harbor Freight’s Motion For Summary Judgment be and the same is hereby GRANTED.”

Strickland v. Wayne Farms-Southland Hatchery
· 2001-03-01
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Wayne Farms-Southland Hatchery’s Motion For Summary Judgment be and the same is hereby GRANTED.”

Ellis v. Huttig Building Products, Inc.
· 2001-04-23
Sua sponte dismissal (court) Granted

“this case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Marous Bros. Construction, L.L.C. v. Alabama State University
· 2008-02-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Alabama State University’s motion to dismiss be and the same is hereby DENIED.”

Harriel v. Dialtone, Inc.
· 2001-09-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“AIM’s Motion is due to be denied.”

Price v. CTB, Inc.
· 2001-07-02
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs Motion To Remand be and the same is hereby DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The located writings span removal, civil rights, employment, insurance, arbitration, evidence, default, administrative law, and contract disputes. They do not establish the distribution of DeMent's full caseload.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge DeMent no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.