Charles Brents Kennamer

United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama district Retired 1955 · served 1931–1955 Appointed by Herbert Hoover (Republican) 36 signed orders read

Judge Kennamer no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Kennamer decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He treated meaningful notice and an opportunity to respond as minimum requirements of fair administrative process.

“There must be due notice and an opportunity to be heard”

He construed an insurer's own policy language in favor of coverage when its categories were uncertain.

“insurance contracts should be liberally construed in favor of the assured.”

He required voter-registration standards to be administered without imposing additional tests based on race.

“no tests can be required of a Negro applicant as a pre-requisite to registration as a voter that is not required of a white applicant”

Procedural preferences

He separated subject-matter jurisdiction from a defendant's personal venue privilege.

“Venue, differing from jurisdiction, relates to the place where suit may be heard.”

He treated multiple acts producing one indivisible injury as a single claim for removal purposes.

“Where there is a single wrong to plaintiff, for which relief is sought, arising from an interlocked series of transactions”

Cautions

He would not broaden an insurance policy's eyewitness exception merely from sympathy for a claimant.

“Nothing but unbridled sympathy for the plaintiff could warrant a finding”

He expected a party alleging fraud to repudiate the agreement promptly after learning the facts.

“The plaintiff, once fraud was discovered, was under a duty to act promptly”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. of Wichita v. City of Florala
· 1931-08-25
Bondholder equitable claim (bondholders) Granted

“The plaintiffs are entitled to relief. Let a decree be entered in accordance with the foregoing opinion.”

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Smith
· 1934-06-30
Motion to reconsider remand (respondents) Denied

“The motion is overruled and denied”

Farmer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
· 1935-07-30
Insurance indemnity claim (complainant) Granted

“A decree will be entered for the complainant.”

United States v. Weathers
· 1937-12-08
Plea in abatement (defendants) Denied

“The plea in abatement is accordingly overruled.”

Durr Drug Co. v. United States
· 1938-03-25
Tax refund claim (taxpayer) Denied

“Judgment will be entered for the defendant, and the plaintiff taxed with the cost.”

Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Peoples Theatres of Alabama, Inc.
· 1938-10-01
Motions to dismiss (theater defendants) Denied

“the motion to dismiss the bills of complaint is overruled and denied.”

Doster v. United States
· 1940-05-03
Motions to dismiss (United States) Granted

“the motion made by the defendant to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint is hereby granted, and the complaint is dismissed.”

Phenix City v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
· 1940-05-18
Motions to dismiss (telephone company) Granted

“The motions of the defendant to dismiss and for a judgment on the pleadings are in my opinion well taken”

Employers Mut. Liability Ins. v. Andrus
· 1941-07-01
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“the defendants’ motions to dismiss the plaintiff’s bill of complaint out of this court be, and the same is, overruled and denied.”

Johnson v. Wilson
· 1942-07-09
Habeas petition (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“An order has been entered dismissing the petition without prejudice.”

Walling v. Snellings
· 1942-09-12
Request for permanent injunction (labor administrator) Granted

“an injunction should issue to prohibit f irther violations of Section 15 thereof.”

United States v. Matthews
· 1943-03-17
Motion to dismiss habeas petition (state custodian) Granted

“the motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, be, and the same is, granted, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is, dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The located writings span civil rights, injunctions, insurance, removal, federal taxation, labor law, habeas corpus, transportation regulation, contracts, and veterans' reemployment. They do not establish the distribution of Kennamer's full caseload.

A historical record

Judge Kennamer no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.