WSBA 1985

Can a legal services funding contract require a lawyer to report information that reveals individual clients' identities and the time spent on their cases?

Short answer: The committee concluded that a legal services contract requiring disclosure of information from which specific clients' identities and the time spent on their cases could be determined is improper and presents a potential conflict in all cases, because the fact of representation, its subject matter, and time spent can be client secrets a lawyer may not reveal to a client's detriment.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The question concerned a proposed contract for legal services that required disclosure of information from which the identity of specific clients and the amount of time spent on their cases could be determined. The committee said that contract language requiring disclosure of information about individual current cases presents a potential conflict in all cases and is improper.

The committee explained that a lawyer may not disclose confidences or secrets of a client that the lawyer reasonably believes could be used to the detriment of a client. In some circumstances, the fact of representation, the subject matter of the representation, and the time spent on an individual client's case may be a secret, and could not be revealed without violating the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Currency note

This opinion was issued under Washington's Code of Professional Responsibility era, in 1985, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a legal services contract require reporting that reveals which clients a lawyer represented and how long their cases took?

A: The committee said no. Contract language requiring disclosure of information about individual current cases is improper and presents a potential conflict in all cases.

Q: Are a client's identity and the time spent on the case confidential?

A: They can be. The committee said that in some circumstances the fact of representation, the subject matter, and the time spent on a client's case may be a secret that cannot be revealed without violating the Disciplinary Rules.

Q: What limits a lawyer's disclosure of this information?

A: A lawyer may not disclose confidences or secrets of a client that the lawyer reasonably believes could be used to the detriment of the client.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies the duty to protect client confidences and secrets under the Washington Code of Professional Responsibility then in force. The committee did not cite a specific Disciplinary Rule by number; it referred generally to the Disciplinary Rules of the Code. The confidentiality duty is now addressed by Washington RPC 1.6 and Model Rule 1.6, and the committee also framed the mandatory disclosure as creating a potential conflict of interest in every case.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • The opinion cites no specific rule by number. It applies the duty to protect client confidences and secrets under the Disciplinary Rules of the Washington Code of Professional Responsibility then in effect (now addressed by RPC 1.6 / Model Rule 1.6).

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 905
Year Issued: 1985
RPC(s):
Subject: Client confidence or secret; legal services contract requiring disclosure of information about individual cases

The question concerned a proposed contract for legal services that required disclosure of information from which the identity of specific clients and the amount of time spent on their cases could be determined. The proposed contract language requiring disclosure of information about individual current cases presents a potential conflict in all cases and is improper. A lawyer may not disclose confidences or secrets of a client which the lawyer reasonable believes could be used to the detriment of a client. In some circumstances, the fact of representation, subject matter of representation, and time spent on an individual client's case may be a secret and could not be revealed without violating the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1985 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.