WSBA 2000

Can a lawyer file an IRS Form 1099 reporting settlement money disbursed to a client without violating client confidentiality?

Short answer: The committee concluded that RPC 1.6 does not prohibit filing a Form 1099 reporting money disbursed to a client, unless the client asked the lawyer to keep the client's identity confidential or asked that the identity or settlement terms not be divulged, in which case RPC 1.6 prohibits the filing. The committee did not opine on the underlying tax law.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2000
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned a lawyer's obligations in reporting the disbursement of a client's settlement proceeds to the IRS by filing a Form 1099. The committee stated that it does not give legal advice and did not comment on the accuracy of the lawyer's interpretation of the tax reporting requirements, assuming the lawyer had correctly analyzed the substantive law or would seek appropriate professional advice.

Subject to that caveat, the committee opined that RPC 1.6 does not prohibit the filing of a Form 1099 reflecting money disbursed to clients, unless the client requested that the lawyer keep the client's identity confidential or otherwise communicated that the identity or the settlement terms not be divulged, in which case RPC 1.6 prohibits the filing. The committee directed the lawyer's attention to WSBA Formal Opinion 194 for further guidance, and also to RPC 1.2(d), RPC 8.4(b) and (c), and RLD 1.1, reminding the lawyer that clients must be able to trust their lawyer to give legal advice that does not expose the client to additional liability.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2000, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here. The opinion also cites RLD 1.1 of the former Rules for Lawyer Discipline, a rule set later superseded by Washington's Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct (ELC); confirm the current authority before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Does filing a Form 1099 that names a client violate the duty of confidentiality?

A: The committee concluded that RPC 1.6 does not prohibit filing a Form 1099 reflecting money disbursed to a client, with one exception.

Q: What is the exception?

A: If the client asked the lawyer to keep the client's identity confidential, or otherwise communicated that the identity or the terms of the settlement not be divulged, RPC 1.6 prohibits the filing.

Q: Did the committee decide whether the tax law required the filing?

A: No. The committee said it does not give legal advice and did not comment on the accuracy of the lawyer's interpretation of the tax reporting requirements; it assumed the lawyer had analyzed the substantive law correctly or would seek appropriate advice.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied Washington RPC 1.6 (confidentiality of information, ABA Model Rule 1.6) to a tax-reporting disclosure, and pointed the lawyer to RPC 1.2(d) (limits on assisting client crime or fraud, ABA Model Rule 1.2(d)) and RPC 8.4(b) and (c) (criminal acts and conduct involving dishonesty, ABA Model Rule 8.4). It also cited WSBA Formal Opinion 194 and RLD 1.1 of the former Rules for Lawyer Discipline.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.6 (confidentiality of information); Washington RPC 1.6
  • ABA Model Rule 1.2(d) (assisting client crime or fraud); Washington RPC 1.2(d)
  • ABA Model Rule 8.4 (misconduct); Washington RPC 8.4(b), 8.4(c)

Other opinions cited:

  • WSBA Formal Opinion 194: directed for further guidance.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1907
Year Issued: 2000
RPC(s): RPC 1.2(d); 1.6; 8.4(b); 8.4(c); RLD 1.1; Formal Opinion 194
Subject: Reporting disbursement to client of settlement proceeds to IRS on Form 1099

Your inquiry concerns the ethical obligations of a lawyer in reporting the disbursement of settlement proceeds of a client to the IRS by filing IRS Form 1099.

The committee stated that it does not give legal advice and therefore does not offer comment on the accuracy of the lawyer’s interpretation of any tax reporting requirements. It is assumed that the lawyer has either correctly analyzed his substantive legal opinions or will seek the appropriate professional advice regarding the same. Subject to that caveat, the committee opines that RPC 1.6 does not prohibit the filing of Form 1099 reflecting moneys disbursed to clients by the lawyers, unless the client has requested that the lawyer keep the client’s identity confidential or has otherwise communicated to the lawyer that his/her identity or the terms of the settlement not be divulged, in which case the lawyer is prohibited from doing so by RPC 1.6. The lawyer’s attention is directed to WSBA Formal Opinion 194 for further guidance.

The lawyer’s attention is further directed to RPC 1.2(d), 8.4(b) and (c) and RLD 1.1. The lawyer is reminded that clients must be able to trust their lawyer to give legal advice that does not expose the client to additional liability.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2000 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.