WSBA 1997

Can a government lawyer collect taxes from a person the lawyer represented in private practice?

Short answer: The committee said RPC 1.9 governs, and that using confidences or secrets obtained in private practice, relating to the representation of the former client, to that former client's disadvantage would violate RPC 1.9.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1997
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned collecting taxes from a former client on behalf of the lawyer's current government employer. The committee said the applicable rule is RPC 1.9. The use of confidences or secrets obtained in private practice, and relating to the representation of the former client, to the disadvantage of that former client would violate RPC 1.9.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1997, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here. Washington's RPC 1.9 corresponds to ABA Model Rule 1.9 (duties to former clients).

Common questions

Q: Can a government lawyer pursue tax collection against a former private-practice client?

A: The committee identified RPC 1.9 as the governing rule and did not categorically bar the work, but limited it by the rule's confidentiality protections.

Q: What conduct would violate RPC 1.9?

A: The committee said using confidences or secrets obtained in private practice, relating to the former client's representation, to that former client's disadvantage would violate RPC 1.9.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied RPC 1.9 (duties to former clients, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 1.9) to a lawyer who moved from private practice into government and now seeks to collect taxes from a former client. The committee located the violation in the misuse of confidences or secrets from the prior representation to the former client's disadvantage.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.9 (duties to former clients); Washington RPC 1.9

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1696
Year Issued: 1997
RPC(s): RPC 1.9
Subject: Conflict of interest; lawyer collecting taxes from former client on behalf of current government employer

[The inquiry concerned collecting taxes from a former client on behalf of the lawyer's current government employer.] The applicable rule in this matter is RPC 1.9. The use of confidences or secrets obtained in private practice and relating to the representation of your former client to the disadvantage of your former client, would violate RPC 1.9.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1997 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.