Can a lawyer sue a client for unpaid fees and costs, including by cross-claim if an expert sues the firm?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The inquirer asked about the ethical propriety of filing a cross-claim against a client if an expert witness sues the firm for payment of expert-witness fees. The committee was of the opinion that under the Rules of Professional Conduct a lawyer may sue a client for payment of legal fees or expenses and costs incurred on the client's behalf, either initially or on a cross-claim.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1996, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here. The committee did not cite a specific Rule of Professional Conduct in this opinion.
Common questions
Q: Can a lawyer cross-claim against a client when an expert sues the firm for unpaid expert fees?
A: The committee concluded that a lawyer may sue a client for fees or expenses and costs incurred on the client's behalf, including on a cross-claim.
Q: Does it matter whether the lawyer files first or cross-claims?
A: No. The committee said the lawyer may pursue payment either by an initial action or as a cross-claim.
Background and rules framework
The committee did not cite a specific Rule of Professional Conduct. It treated a lawyer's collection of fees, expenses, and costs incurred on a client's behalf as permissible under the Rules generally, whether pursued as an initial suit or as a cross-claim brought in response to an expert's claim against the firm.
Citations and references
The committee did not cite a specific Rule of Professional Conduct in this opinion.
See also
- WA Ethics Op. 1678: Suing or Mediating a Fee Dispute With a Client
- WA Ethics Op. 1666: Suing a Client on a Bounced Check
Source
- Landing page: https://ao.wsba.org/print.aspx?ID=751
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Advisory Opinion: 1677
Year Issued: 1996
RPC(s):
Subject: Suit against former client for expert witness fees
The Committee discussed your inquiry regarding the ethical propriety of filing a cross-claim against your client in the event suit is filed against your firm by an expert witness for payment of expert witness fees. The Committee was of the opinion that under the Rules of Professional Conduct, you may sue your client for payment of legal fees or expenses/costs incurred on the client's behalf, either initially or on a cross-claim.
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1996. Ezel checks the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace