Can a for-profit service solicit bids from law firms on behalf of its business clients?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The inquirer was considering the operation of a for-profit service organization that would solicit bids from law firms on behalf of its business clients. The committee discussed the matter with the inquirer present and raised several concerns during the discussion.
The committee was of the opinion that the proposed service would violate RPC 7.2(c).
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1995, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here. Washington's RPC 7.2 corresponds to ABA Model Rule 7.2 (communications concerning a lawyer's services), which includes the prohibition on giving anything of value for recommending the lawyer's services.
Common questions
Q: Can a for-profit company solicit bids from law firms for its business clients?
A: The committee was of the opinion that the proposed for-profit service would violate RPC 7.2(c).
Q: Did the committee approve the bidding model with conditions?
A: No. The committee raised several concerns and concluded that the proposed service would violate RPC 7.2(c).
Background and rules framework
The opinion addressed RPC 7.2(c) (communications concerning a lawyer's services, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 7.2, including the bar on giving anything of value for recommending a lawyer's services). The committee assessed the proposed for-profit bid-soliciting organization against that rule and concluded it would violate the rule.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- ABA Model Rule 7.2 (communications concerning a lawyer's services); Washington RPC 7.2(c)
See also
- WA Ethics Op. 1628: Sharing a Consultation Fee With Translator Referral Sources
- WA Ethics Op. 1646: Union Referral of Members Protected by Right of Association
Source
- Landing page: https://ao.wsba.org/print.aspx?ID=722
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Advisory Opinion: 1639
Year Issued: 1995
RPC(s): RPC 7.2(c)
Subject: Solicitation; referral service
Since you were present during the Committee's discussion of this matter, I will briefly summarize the Committee's decision. The Committee understood that you were considering the operation of a for-profit service organization [which would solicit bids from law firms on behalf of its business clients.] Although several concerns were raised by the Committee which were shared with you during discussion, the Committee was of the opinion that the proposed service would violate RPC 7.2(c).
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1995. Ezel checks the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace