WSBA 1995

Can a lawyer add Washington's business and occupation (B&O) tax to a client's bill as part of the fee?

Short answer: The committee was of the opinion that a lawyer is prohibited from charging the B&O tax as part of the fee, because it is not a sales tax and presenting it that way would be misleading.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer asked about charging Washington State business and occupation (B&O) tax on the lawyer's billing and including that tax as part of the fee. The committee was of the opinion that the lawyer is prohibited from charging the B&O tax as part of the fee.

The committee's reasoning was that the B&O tax is not a sales tax, so a charge presenting it as one (a separately passed-through tax like a sales tax) would be misleading.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1995, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here. RPC 1.5 corresponds to ABA Model Rule 1.5 on fees.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer pass the B&O tax through to the client as a separate charge?

A: No. The committee said the lawyer is prohibited from charging the B&O tax as part of the fee because it is not a sales tax and the charge would be misleading.

Q: Why does it matter that the B&O tax is not a sales tax?

A: The committee tied the prohibition to that distinction: presenting the B&O tax as a pass-through charge like a sales tax would mislead the client.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied RPC 1.5 (fees, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 1.5). The committee treated billing the B&O tax to the client as a separate fee component as a misleading characterization, since the B&O tax is a tax on the lawyer's business rather than a sales tax on the client's purchase.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.5 (fees); Washington RPC 1.5

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1604
Year Issued: 1995
RPC(s): RPC 1.5
Subject: Charging B&O tax as part of fee

The Committee discussed your inquiry regarding the ethical propriety of charging Washington State B&O tax on your billing and including that tax as part of your fee. It was the Committee's opinion that you are prohibited from charging the B&O tax as part of your fee because this is not a sales tax and such a charge would be misleading.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1995 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.