Must a law firm turn over a former client's time and billing records to the new lawyers now representing that client?

Short answer The committee was of the opinion that the firm is not required to respond to a request for time or billing records unless the request is made by one of the firm's own former clients.
Bar
WSBA
Issued
1994

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A firm asked whether it is required to disclose the time and/or billing records of former clients to the attorneys presently representing those clients. The committee was of the opinion that the firm is not required to respond to a request for information unless the request is made by one of the firm's former clients.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1994, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Does a firm have to send a former client's billing records to the client's new lawyers?

A: The committee said the firm is not required to respond to such a request unless it is made by one of the firm's own former clients.

Q: Who can compel the records under this opinion?

A: The committee framed the duty as running to the firm's former client; a request from the new attorneys, rather than from the former client, does not require a response under the opinion.

Background and rules framework

The committee addressed a firm's obligation to release time and billing records to successor counsel. It resolved the question by tying any duty to respond to a request coming from the firm's own former client, rather than from the new attorneys, and did not cite a specific RPC number in the text indexed here.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1585
Year Issued: 1994
RPC(s):
Subject: Disclosure of client records to client's new counsel

The RPC Committee reviewed your question of whether a law firm is required to disclose time and/or billing records of former clients to attorneys presently representing those clients. The Committee was of the opinion that your law firm is not required to respond to a request for information unless the request is made by one of your law firm's former clients.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace