WSBA 1993

Can in-house counsel use letterhead that does not include the name of the employer?

Short answer: The committee concluded it made no difference what letterhead in-house counsel used, so long as the lawyer did not mislead recipients of the letters about whom the lawyer was representing.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer employed as in-house counsel asked about using letterhead that did not bear the name of the employer.

The committee was of the opinion that it made no difference what letterhead the lawyer used, so long as in using any letterhead the lawyer did not mislead the recipients of the letters as to whom the lawyer was representing.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1993, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Must in-house counsel's letterhead name the employer?

A: The committee said it made no difference what letterhead the lawyer used, as long as it did not mislead recipients about whom the lawyer represented.

Q: What was the controlling concern?

A: Whether the letterhead misled the recipients of the letters as to whom the lawyer was representing.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied RPC 7.5 (corresponding to ABA Model Rule 7.5), governing firm names and letterheads. The committee read the rule's core concern as avoiding misleading communications, so the omission of the employer's name was acceptable unless it misled recipients about the lawyer's client.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 7.5 (firm names and letterheads); Washington RPC 7.5

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1531
Year Issued: 1993
RPC(s): RPC 7.5
Subject: Letterhead of in-house counsel omits name of employer

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning use of letterhead when employed as in-house counsel that did not bear the name of the employer in the letterhead. The Committee was of the opinion that it made no difference what letterhead the lawyer used, so long as in using any letterhead he did not mislead the recipients of the letters as to whom he was representing.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.