Ezel / Ethics Opinions / WSBA
WSBA 1992

Can a firm keep a named principal's name in the firm name when that lawyer practices law independently of the firm?

Short answer: The committee concluded RPC 7.5(b) would not permit a firm to include in its name the name of a lawyer who practices law independent of the firm.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer asked about the use of a firm name in which one of the named principals intends to practice law independent from the firm. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(b) would not permit a law firm to include in its name the name of a lawyer who was engaged in the practice of law independent from the firm.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1992, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a firm name include a lawyer who practices independently of the firm?

A: The committee concluded that RPC 7.5(b) would not permit a firm to include in its name the name of a lawyer who practices law independent of the firm.

Q: What is the concern with such a firm name?

A: The committee treated a firm name that includes a lawyer practicing independently as conveying a firm relationship that did not exist, which RPC 7.5(b) does not permit.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied RPC 7.5(b) (firm names and letterheads), corresponding to ABA Model Rule 7.5, which bars a firm name that misleadingly implies a relationship among lawyers. The committee read the rule to forbid keeping in the firm name a named principal who actually practices law independent of the firm.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 7.5 (firm names and letterheads); Washington RPC 7.5(b)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1486
Year Issued: 1992
RPC(s): RPC 7.5
Subject: Firm name includes name of lawyer who practices independently

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning use of a law firm name in which one of the named principals in the firm intends to practice law independent from the law firm. The Committee was of the opinion that RPC 7.5(b) would not permit a law firm to include in its name the name of a lawyer who was engaged in the practice of law independent from the law firm.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.