Must a lawyer serving as an arbitrator recuse when the lawyer has a pending civil case against an attorney representing a party in the arbitration?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A lawyer asked whether a lawyer acting as an arbitrator in a civil lawsuit should recuse because the lawyer had a pending civil case against one of the attorneys representing a party in the arbitration. The committee was of the opinion that this situation is not addressed by the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Because the question involves a lawyer acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, the committee directed that the inquiry be addressed to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Commission through the Office of the Administrator for the Courts.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1992, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Did the committee decide whether the lawyer-arbitrator had to recuse?
A: No. The committee concluded the Rules of Professional Conduct do not address the situation.
Q: Where did the committee say the question should go?
A: Because the lawyer was acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, the committee directed the inquiry to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Commission through the Office of the Administrator for the Courts.
Background and rules framework
The committee declined to opine because the conduct, a lawyer sitting as an arbitrator, falls under quasi-judicial rather than lawyer-conduct standards. It identified no Rule of Professional Conduct as governing the recusal question and routed the matter to the body that addresses judicial ethics, the Judicial Ethics Advisory Commission.
Citations and references
The committee identified no Rule of Professional Conduct as applicable and cited none.
See also
- CA Op. 1984-80: Lawyer as Party-Designated Arbitrator
- WA Ethics Op. 1325: Lawyer Also Serving as Part-Time Judge
Source
- Landing page: https://ao.wsba.org/print.aspx?ID=550
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Advisory Opinion: 1470
Year Issued: 1992
RPC(s):
Subject: Conflict of interest; lawyer acting as arbitrator has pending civil case against attorney for party to arbitration
The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning whether a lawyer acting as an arbitrator in a civil law suit should recuse himself because he had a pending civil case against one of the attorneys who was representing a party in the arbitration. The Committee was of the opinion that this situation is not addressed by the Rules of Professional Conduct, and that since this involves a lawyer acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, your inquiry should be directed to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Commission through the Office of the Administrator for the Courts.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1992 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.