When partners fight over who gets the partnership's files, how does a lawyer decide whose files they are?

Short answer The committee declined to opine because the threshold question, who the client is, is a legal question it cannot answer; once the client is identified, WSBA Formal Opinion 181 resolves the file dispute.
Bar
WSBA
Issued
1992

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer asked about a dispute between partners over possession of partnership files. The committee was of the opinion that the problem is determining who the client is, and that this is a legal question on which the committee cannot render an opinion.

Once the client is identified, the committee said, WSBA Formal Opinion 181 should resolve the file issue.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1992, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: When partners dispute who holds the partnership's files, did the committee say who gets them?

A: No. The committee said the threshold question, who the client is, is a legal question on which it cannot render an opinion.

Q: Once the client is identified, what governs the file dispute?

A: The committee said that once the client is identified, WSBA Formal Opinion 181 should resolve the issue.

Background and rules framework

The opinion concerns client files and the handling of files on termination or dispute, the subject matter of the rule on declining or terminating representation (corresponding to ABA Model Rule 1.16, which addresses return of client property and papers). The committee did not reach the rule's application: it treated the determinative question, the identity of the client among disputing partners, as a legal question outside its advisory role, and pointed to WSBA Formal Opinion 181 for the file analysis once the client is known.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.16 (declining or terminating representation; return of client files and property); Washington RPC 1.16

Other opinions cited:

  • WSBA Formal Opinion 181: resolution of client-file disputes once the client is identified.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1464
Year Issued: 1992
RPC(s): Formal Opinion 181
Subject: Client files; representation of partnership

The Committee reviewed your inquiry regarding a dispute between partners as to possession of partnership files. The Committee was of the opinion that the problem is to determine who the client is. That is a legal question on which the Committee cannot render an opinion. Once you have identified who the client is, then Formal Opinion 181 should resolve the issue.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1992. Ezel checks the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace