Can a U.S. Department of Justice trial attorney also serve as a judge pro tem in municipal court?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A lawyer asked whether a trial attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice could properly serve as a judge pro tem in municipal court. The committee was of the opinion that neither the Rules of Professional Conduct nor the Code of Judicial Conduct would prohibit holding both positions.
The committee did not treat the dual role as creating a conflict in the abstract. It said that if any conflict arose, it would have to be examined on a case-by-case basis in the situation in which the conflict arose.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1991, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Can a federal government lawyer serve as a part-time municipal judge pro tem?
A: The committee was of the opinion that neither the Rules of Professional Conduct nor the Code of Judicial Conduct would prohibit a U.S. Department of Justice trial attorney from being so employed.
Q: Does holding both roles automatically create a conflict of interest?
A: No. The committee said that if any conflict arose, it would have to be examined on a case-by-case basis in the situation in which the conflict arose.
Background and rules framework
The opinion considered conflicts of interest under RPC 1.7, Washington's concurrent-conflict rule (ABA Model Rule 1.7), together with the Code of Judicial Conduct that governs a person serving as a judge pro tem. The committee found no categorical bar in either body of rules and located any conflict analysis in the specific case as it arose.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- ABA Model Rule 1.7 (concurrent conflicts of interest)
- Washington RPC 1.7
Other authority:
- Washington Code of Judicial Conduct (governing service as a judge pro tem)
See also
- SC Bar Ethics Op. 90-10: Part-Time Judge's Partners
- SC Bar Ethics Op. 90-04: Solicitor Before Spouse's Judge
Source
- Landing page: https://ao.wsba.org/print.aspx?ID=509
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Advisory Opinion: 1429
Year Issued: 1991
RPC(s): RPC 1.7
Subject: Trial attorney for federal government serving as judge pro tem; conflict of interest
The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning the propriety of a trial attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice serving as a judge pro tem in municipal court. The Committee was of the opinion that neither the Rules of Professional Conduct nor the Code of Judicial Conduct would prohibit being so employed. If there were any conflict, it would have to be examined on a case by case basis in which any conflict arose.
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1991. Ezel checks the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace