Must a defense lawyer tell the court that a client is violating the conditions of a pretrial release order?

Short answer The committee was of the opinion, with one dissent, that the lawyer could not disclose that a criminal defendant is violating release conditions except in compliance with RPC 1.6.
Bar
WSBA
Issued
1991

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned whether a lawyer has an obligation to advise the court that a criminal defendant is violating the conditions of a court order releasing the client from custody. The committee was of the opinion, with one dissent, that the lawyer could not disclose such information except in compliance with RPC 1.6.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1991, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Does a defense lawyer have to report a client's violation of release conditions to the court?

A: Under this 1991 opinion, no, except as RPC 1.6 permits; the committee was of the opinion, with one dissent, that the lawyer could not disclose the violation otherwise.

Q: Was the committee unanimous?

A: No. The opinion records one dissent from the conclusion.

Background and rules framework

At the time of this opinion, Washington's RPC 1.6 governed confidentiality of client information, the subject the Model Rules place in Rule 1.6. The committee treated a client's violation of release conditions as protected client information that the lawyer could disclose only as that rule allowed, over one member's dissent.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 1.6 (confidentiality of information)
  • Washington RPC 1.6

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning whether a lawyer has an obligation to advise the court that a criminal defendant is violating the conditions of a court order releasing the client from custody. The Committee was of the opinion, with one dissent, that the lawyer could not disclose such information except in compliance with RPC 1.6.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1991. Ezel checks the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace