WSBA 1990

Can a lawyer run a hypnotherapy practice alongside a law practice?

Short answer: The committee was of the opinion that nothing in the Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits running a hypnotherapy practice with a law practice, while cautioning about separate fee schedules, cross-referrals, RPC 7.1(b) expectations, and disclosing that the attorney-client privilege does not apply to hypnotherapy clients.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiring lawyer asked whether anything in the Rules of Professional Conduct would prohibit conducting a hypnotherapy practice along with a law practice. The committee was of the opinion that nothing in the rules would prohibit such a practice, but offered several cautions.

The committee was of the opinion that the lawyer should prepare and maintain separate fee schedules for legal services and hypnotherapy services, and should not use one practice as a source of referrals for the other. The committee cautioned that the lawyer should be careful not to violate RPC 7.1(b) by creating unjustified expectations, that is, by implying the lawyer could achieve results through hypnotherapy that the lawyer might not be able to achieve as a lawyer. Finally, the committee cautioned that the lawyer should disclose to hypnotherapy clients that the attorney-client relationship and privilege do not apply when the lawyer acts in that capacity, and should obtain a consent to that effect.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1990, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer also work as a hypnotherapist?

A: Under this 1990 opinion, yes; the committee was of the opinion that nothing in the Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits running a hypnotherapy practice along with a law practice.

Q: What cautions did the committee attach?

A: Keep separate fee schedules for the two practices, do not use one as a referral source for the other, avoid creating unjustified expectations under RPC 7.1(b), and disclose to hypnotherapy clients that the attorney-client privilege does not apply.

Q: Does the attorney-client privilege cover the hypnotherapy work?

A: No. The committee was of the opinion that the lawyer should disclose to hypnotherapy clients that the attorney-client relationship and privilege do not apply when acting in that capacity, and obtain consent to that effect.

Background and rules framework

At the time of this opinion, Washington's RPC 7.1(b) addressed communications that create unjustified expectations about a lawyer's services, the subject the Model Rules place in Rule 7.1. The committee found no bar to the dual practice itself and framed its cautions around keeping the two businesses distinct and not misleading clients about what either could deliver or about the protections that attach to the legal relationship.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 7.1 (communications creating unjustified expectations)
  • Washington RPC 7.1(b)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning the question whether there was anything in the Rules of Professional Conduct which would prohibit you from conducting a hypnotherapy practice along with your law practice. The Committee was of the opinion that nothing in the Rules of Professional Conduct would prohibit such a practice. However, the Committee wants to caution you in some regards. First, the Committee was of the opinion you should prepare and have separate fee schedules for legal services and hypnotherapy services and that you should not use one practice as a source of referrals for the other. Further, the Committee cautioned that you should be careful not to violate RPC 7.1(b) in creating any unjustified expectations by implying that you can achieve results through your hypnotherapy practice that you may not be able to achieve as a lawyer. Further, the Committee cautioned that you should be sure to disclose to your hypnotherapy clients that the attorney/client relationship and privilege do not apply when you are acting in that capacity and that you should obtain a consent to that effect.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.