WSBA 1989

If a lawyer receives a settlement check for more than the agreed amount, what must the lawyer do?

Short answer: The committee was of the opinion that the lawyer must clarify with the adjuster whether the case was settled for the agreed amount or the larger amount; if the larger payment was made in error, the lawyer must return the excess and should get the settlement agreement amended to reflect the actual settlement.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lawyer received a settlement release and a check for $5,000 when the agreed settlement was $4,000. The committee was of the opinion that the lawyer has an obligation to clarify with the adjuster whether the adjuster intended the case to be settled for $4,000 or $5,000. If the $5,000 payment was made in error, the committee was of the opinion that the lawyer must return the extra $1,000, and that in addition the lawyer should get the settlement agreement amended to reflect the actual settlement.

The committee did not cite a specific numbered Rule of Professional Conduct in this opinion.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1989, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: What should a lawyer do after getting a settlement check that is too large?

A: Under this 1989 opinion, clarify with the adjuster whether the larger figure was intended; if the overpayment was an error, return the excess.

Q: Is clarifying with the adjuster enough?

A: If the payment was made in error, the committee said the lawyer must also return the extra amount and should get the settlement agreement amended to reflect the actual settlement.

Q: Did the committee tie this to a specific rule?

A: No. The opinion states the obligations without citing a numbered Rule of Professional Conduct.

Background and rules framework

The committee addressed a lawyer's handling of a settlement payment that exceeded the agreed amount. Without citing a numbered rule, it concluded the lawyer must first clarify the adjuster's intent and, if the overpayment was an error, return the excess and have the settlement agreement amended to reflect the true settlement figure.

Citations and references

The opinion does not cite a numbered Rule of Professional Conduct.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning your receipt of a settlement release and a check in the amount of $5000.00, when the agreed settlement was $4,000.00. The Committee was of the opinion that you have an obligation to clarify with the adjuster whether the adjuster intended the case to be settled for $4,000.00 or $5,000.00. If the $5,000.00 payment was made in error, then the Committee was of the opinion that you must return the extra $1,000.00, and that, in addition, you should get the settlement agreement amended to reflect the actual settlement.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.