When a lawyer also serves as a part-time or pro tem judge, can the lawyer issue a search warrant for a firm client, tell the client, or later represent that person?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The inquiry arose where attorneys also serve as part-time or pro tem judges and are asked to approve search warrants. The first question was whether the attorney, acting as judge, should consider a warrant request involving a client of the firm. The committee was of the opinion that this question involves judicial conduct and should properly be answered by the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee, to whom the inquirer had also submitted the question.
On the second question, whether or not the warrant was issued, the committee was of the opinion that RPC 8.4(d) would prohibit the lawyer from advising the client of the situation, because doing so would be prejudicial to the administration of justice.
On the third question, whether the lawyer or another lawyer in the firm could later represent that person in a subsequent criminal proceeding, the committee was of the opinion that RPC 1.12 would prohibit such representation by either the lawyer who issued the warrant as a judge or another member of that lawyer's firm.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1988, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. The rules it discusses, RPC 1.12 (former judge or other adjudicative officer) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), correspond to Model Rules 1.12 and 8.4 and have since been amended. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Can a lawyer who acts as a part-time judge tip off a firm client about a search warrant?
A: Per the opinion, no. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 8.4(d) prohibits the lawyer from advising the client of the situation, because it would be prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Q: After issuing the warrant as judge, can the lawyer or the firm defend that person?
A: No. The committee was of the opinion that RPC 1.12 prohibits both the lawyer who issued the warrant as judge and any other lawyer in that firm from later representing the person in a subsequent criminal proceeding.
Q: Did the committee decide whether the judge should issue the warrant at all?
A: No. The committee declined to opine on that question, treating it as a judicial-conduct matter properly answered by the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee.
Background and rules framework
The opinion applies Washington RPC 1.12 (former judge or other adjudicative officer) and RPC 8.4(d) (misconduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), corresponding to Model Rules 1.12 and 8.4. The committee separated the judicial-conduct question (deferred to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee) from the lawyer-conduct questions: disclosure to the client is barred under RPC 8.4(d), and later representation of the person by the lawyer-judge or the firm is imputed and barred under RPC 1.12.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Washington RPC 1.12 (former judge or other adjudicative officer), corresponding to Model Rule 1.12.
- Washington RPC 8.4(d) (misconduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), corresponding to Model Rule 8.4.
See also
- WSBA Ethics Op. 1073: a judicial law clerk's later asbestos-case conflicts under RPC 1.12
- WSBA Ethics Op. 1019: appearing before a court commissioner formerly associated with the firm
Source
- Landing page: https://ao.wsba.org/print.aspx?ID=321
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Advisory Opinion: 1241
Year Issued: 1988
RPC(s): RPC 1.12; 8.4(d)
Subject: Conflict of interest; issuance by lawyer who serves as part time or pro tem judge of search warrant for client of lawyer's firm
The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning certain questions arising when attorneys also serve as part-time or pro tem judges and are requested to approve search warrants. The first question is whether the attorney as judge should consider a request to issue a warrant of a client of the firm. The Committee was of the opinion that since this question involves judicial conduct, it should properly be answered by the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee to whom you have also submitted an inquiry.
Your next question was, whether such a warrant was issued or not, the lawyer has a duty to advise his client of the situation. The Committee was of the opinion that Rule 8.4(d) would prohibit such disclosure as it would be prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Your third question is whether, after such a warrant was issued by the lawyer as judge, that lawyer or another lawyer in the law firm could undertake to represent that person in any subsequent criminal proceeding. The Committee was of the opinion that RPC 1.12 would prohibit such representation by either the lawyer who issued the warrant as a judge or another member of that lawyer's firm.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1988 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.