Can a lawyer accept client referrals from a person who solicits charitable gifts for a religious organization?

Short answer The committee was of the opinion that, on the facts presented, accepting such referrals would not violate RPC 7.3 where the potential clients contact the lawyer themselves and the relationship and fee are set directly between the lawyer and client; it noted the lawyer should consider any conflict between duties to the client and to the organization.
Bar
WSBA
Issued
1988

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ask about yours and see what the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned referrals of clients to the lawyer by a client who is employed by a national religious organization to solicit inter vivos and testamentary gifts to the religious foundation. The committee understood the facts to be that the potential clients, if interested, would contact the lawyer, that the attorney-client relationship would be established directly between the lawyer and the client, and that the fee agreement would be negotiated between them.

The committee was of the opinion that, based on the facts as presented, this would not be in violation of RPC 7.3. It did note that the lawyer should consider whether there would be any conflict between the lawyer's duty to the client and any duty the lawyer may have to the organization.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1988, before the 2006 revisions to the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. The rule then numbered RPC 7.3, governing direct contact with prospective clients, corresponds to Model Rule 7.3 and has since been amended. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer take referrals from someone whose job is soliciting gifts for a religious organization?

A: Per the opinion, yes on the facts presented. The committee was of the opinion that the arrangement would not violate RPC 7.3 where the potential clients contact the lawyer themselves and set the relationship and fee directly with the lawyer.

Q: What facts made the referral arrangement permissible?

A: The committee understood that interested potential clients would contact the lawyer, that the attorney-client relationship would be established directly between the lawyer and the client, and that the fee agreement would be negotiated between them.

Q: Did the committee flag any other concern?

A: Yes. The committee noted that the lawyer should consider whether there would be any conflict between the lawyer's duty to the client and any duty the lawyer may have to the organization.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applies the rule then numbered Washington RPC 7.3, corresponding to Model Rule 7.3, which governs direct contact with prospective clients. The committee made the outcome turn on who initiates the relationship: because the potential clients would contact the lawyer and contract directly, the committee found no RPC 7.3 violation on the facts, while noting the separate question of a possible conflict between the lawyer's duties to the client and to the organization.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Washington RPC 7.3 (direct contact with prospective clients), corresponding to Model Rule 7.3.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1188
Year Issued: 1988
RPC(s): RPC 7.3
Subject: Referrals; solicitation

The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning referrals of clients to you by a client who is employed by a national religious organization to solicit intervivos and testamentary gifts to the religious foundation. The Committee understood the facts to be that the potential clients, if interested, would contact you and that the attorney-client relationship would be established directly between you and that the fee agreement would be negotiated between you. The Committee was of the opinion that based upon the facts as presented, this would not be in violation of RPC 7.3. The Committee did note that you should consider whether there would be any conflict between your duty to the client and any duty you may have to the organization.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1988. Ezel checks the current Washington Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace