When it is unclear who a lawyer's client is, what does the lawyer have to do about the relationship?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The inquiry turned on determining who the lawyer's client was. The committee said the answer to the inquiry depended on that determination, which it viewed as a legal question on which it could render no opinion, and which the lawyer should attempt to resolve with the client.
The committee added one ethical point it could speak to: RPC 4.3 obligates the lawyer to make clear, to all parties with whom the lawyer is dealing, whether a lawyer-client relationship exists.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1987, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Will an ethics committee decide who a lawyer's client is?
A: Per this opinion, no. The committee treated who the client is as a legal question it could not answer, and said the lawyer should resolve it with the client.
Q: What duty did the committee identify under RPC 4.3?
A: That the lawyer must make clear to all parties with whom the lawyer is dealing whether a lawyer-client relationship exists.
Background and rules framework
The opinion applied RPC 4.3 (dealing with an unrepresented person, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 4.3), which the committee read to require the lawyer to make clear to all parties whether a lawyer-client relationship exists. The committee otherwise declined the underlying question of who the client was as a legal one outside its remit.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- ABA Model Rule 4.3 (dealing with unrepresented person); Washington RPC 4.3
See also
- WSBA Ethics Op. 1821: Adverse Caller's Voicemail
- WSBA Ethics Op. 928: No Client Relationship, No Authority
- WSBA Ethics Op. 1411: Prospective Client Conflicts
Source
- Landing page: https://ao.wsba.org/print.aspx?ID=1152
Original opinion text
Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.
Advisory Opinion: 1098
Year Issued: 1987
RPC(s): RPC 4.3
Subject: Existence of Lawyer-client relationship
The Committee was of the opinion that the answer to your inquiry depends on determining who your client is. The Committee believes that to be a legal question on which the Committee can render no opinion, and that it is something you should attempt to resolve with [your client]. The Committee is of the opinion that Rule 4.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct does obligate your to make clear to all parties with whom you are dealing whether a lawyer-client relationship exists.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1987 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.