WSBA 1987

When it is unclear who a lawyer's client is, what does the lawyer have to do about the relationship?

Short answer: The committee concluded that whether a lawyer-client relationship exists, and with whom, is a legal question it could not answer, and is something the lawyer should resolve with the client; but RPC 4.3 obligates the lawyer to make clear to all parties with whom the lawyer is dealing whether a lawyer-client relationship exists.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry turned on determining who the lawyer's client was. The committee said the answer to the inquiry depended on that determination, which it viewed as a legal question on which it could render no opinion, and which the lawyer should attempt to resolve with the client.

The committee added one ethical point it could speak to: RPC 4.3 obligates the lawyer to make clear, to all parties with whom the lawyer is dealing, whether a lawyer-client relationship exists.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1987, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Will an ethics committee decide who a lawyer's client is?

A: Per this opinion, no. The committee treated who the client is as a legal question it could not answer, and said the lawyer should resolve it with the client.

Q: What duty did the committee identify under RPC 4.3?

A: That the lawyer must make clear to all parties with whom the lawyer is dealing whether a lawyer-client relationship exists.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied RPC 4.3 (dealing with an unrepresented person, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 4.3), which the committee read to require the lawyer to make clear to all parties whether a lawyer-client relationship exists. The committee otherwise declined the underlying question of who the client was as a legal one outside its remit.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 4.3 (dealing with unrepresented person); Washington RPC 4.3

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1098
Year Issued: 1987
RPC(s): RPC 4.3
Subject: Existence of Lawyer-client relationship

The Committee was of the opinion that the answer to your inquiry depends on determining who your client is. The Committee believes that to be a legal question on which the Committee can render no opinion, and that it is something you should attempt to resolve with [your client]. The Committee is of the opinion that Rule 4.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct does obligate your to make clear to all parties with whom you are dealing whether a lawyer-client relationship exists.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.