WSBA 1987

Must a lawyer pay an expert witness's fees when the lawyer subpoenaed the expert at the client's request?

Short answer: The committee concluded that, because a lawyer issues subpoenas over the lawyer's signature as an officer of the court, failing to pay witness fees when requested, or requiring a witness to spend an unreasonable amount of time sitting in court, is prejudicial to the administration of justice and violates RPC 8.4(d).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The inquiry concerned a lawyer's responsibility to pay witness fees for an expert witness the lawyer had subpoenaed at the client's request, where the expert was required to appear in court on three consecutive days only to testify briefly at the end of the trial.

The committee concluded that because a lawyer is permitted to issue subpoenas over the lawyer's signature as an officer of the court, the failure to pay witness fees when requested, or requiring a witness unnecessarily to spend an unreasonable amount of time sitting in court, is prejudicial to the administration of justice and violates RPC 8.4(d).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1987, before the Washington State Bar Association's adoption of the 2006 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Does a lawyer have to pay an expert the lawyer subpoenaed at the client's request?

A: The committee concluded the lawyer must pay the witness fees when requested; not doing so violates RPC 8.4(d) as conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Q: Why does the duty rest on the lawyer who issued the subpoena?

A: The committee reasoned that the lawyer issues subpoenas over the lawyer's signature as an officer of the court, so the lawyer is responsible for the witness fees and for not causing the witness to wait an unreasonable time.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied Washington RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, corresponding to ABA Model Rule 8.4(d)), tying the duty to pay a subpoenaed expert's fees to the lawyer's role as an officer of the court who issues the subpoena.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • ABA Model Rule 8.4 (misconduct; conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); Washington RPC 8.4(d)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Advisory Opinion: 1090
Year Issued: 1987
RPC(s): RPC 8.4(d)
Subject: Duty to pay expert witness fees when expert subpoenaed at client's request

The Committee considered your inquiry concerning your responsibility to pay witness fees for an expert witness who has been subpoenaed by you at the request of your client, and who was required to appear in court on three consecutive days, only to testify briefly at the conclusion of the trial. The Committee was of the opinion that as a lawyer is permitted to issue subpoenas over the lawyer's signature as an officer of the court, the failure of the lawyer to pay witness fees when requested or requiring a witness unnecessarily to spend an unreasonable amount of time sitting in court are prejudicial to the administration of justice and violate Rule 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.