WISBAR 1987

Can a lawyer who served as a child's guardian ad litem in a protective services case later prosecute a termination of parental rights case involving the same child?

Short answer: The opinion concluded that an attorney who once acted as guardian ad litem for a child in a protective services proceeding may not later act as prosecutor (or as defense counsel) in a termination of parental rights proceeding involving the same child unless the facts and issues in the two proceedings bear no substantial relationship, no confidential information was acquired as guardian ad litem that would materially relate to the termination proceeding, and the former client (the child, through the guardian ad litem) gives informed consent. The committee recommended that the disclosures and consent be in writing.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Opinion E-87-12 asked whether an attorney who once acted as guardian ad litem for a child in protective services proceedings may subsequently act as prosecutor in a termination of parental rights proceeding involving the same child. The committee concluded that the attorney may not do so, and likewise may not act as lawyer for the defendant in the termination proceeding, unless three conditions are met: the facts and issues in the two proceedings bear no substantial relationship; no confidential information was acquired as guardian ad litem that would materially relate to the termination of parental rights proceeding; and the former client, that is, the child, through his or her guardian ad litem in the parental rights proceeding, provides informed consent to the representation.

The committee grounded its analysis in SCR 20:1.9, treating the child as the lawyer's former client and the guardian-ad-litem role as creating duties that carry into the later proceeding, and cited its earlier Formal Opinions E-85-8 and E-85-9. It recommended that the disclosures and consent be in writing.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1987, before Wisconsin's July 1, 2007 adoption of the revised Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys (the state's Ethics 2000 update). The former-client conflict rule SCR 20:1.9 was later revised. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a former guardian ad litem for a child later prosecute a termination case about that child?

A: Per the opinion, generally no. The committee concluded SCR 20:1.9 bars it unless the matters are not substantially related, no relevant confidential information was acquired, and the child consents through the guardian ad litem.

Q: Does the same limit apply if the lawyer wants to defend rather than prosecute?

A: Yes. The committee concluded the lawyer may not act as prosecutor or as lawyer for the defendant in the termination proceeding under the same conditions.

Q: Who gives consent for the child?

A: The committee said the former client is the child, and consent is provided through the child's guardian ad litem in the parental rights proceeding, preferably in writing.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interpreted SCR 20:1.9 / Model Rule 1.9 (duties to former clients), applying the substantial-relationship and confidential-information analysis to a lawyer who moves from a child's guardian ad litem to prosecutor (or defense counsel) in a related termination of parental rights case.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Wis. SCR 20:1.9 / Model Rule 1.9 (duties to former clients)

Other opinions cited:

  • Wisconsin Formal Ops. E-85-8, E-85-9 (1985)

See also

Source

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.