Could Vermont's public defender program contract with the Defender General's spouse for conflict-case appeals?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1982. Ask about yours and see what the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Defender General's office asked whether it could retain the Defender General's spouse for appeals in cases handled at trial by assigned counsel, where a public defender could not take the case because of a conflict.
Relying on ABA Formal Opinion 340 and its own Opinion 77-6, the committee said marriage alone did not disqualify the lawyer spouse. It found no special financial arrangement and considered the Defender General's limited involvement in individual public defender cases. It concluded that the contract did not breach the former Code.
The committee said each spouse remained responsible for protecting client confidences and avoiding divided loyalty. If those obligations could not be met, the conflicting representation could not continue. It described client consent as desirable, but said consent was not necessary to comply with the Code in the circumstances presented.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1982 under Vermont's former Code of Professional Responsibility. The Vermont Supreme Court's rules history says the Rules of Professional Conduct replaced the Code and applied to lawyer conduct after September 1, 1999; the court later made comprehensive amendments in 2009. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement.
Common questions
Q: Did the spouses' marriage automatically disqualify the appellate lawyer?
A: No. The committee rejected a per se conflict rule for the proposed contract.
Q: Was client consent required for this arrangement under the former Code?
A: The committee called consent desirable but said it was not necessary to comply with the Code on these facts.
Q: When could the conflicting representation not continue?
A: If the spouses could not preserve client confidences or undivided loyalty, the committee said it could not continue.
Background and rules framework
The opinion discussed former Code DR 5-105(D) and the application of marital-conflict principles to public defender assignments.
Citations and references
Vermont Code of Professional Responsibility:
- DR 5-105(D)
Other opinions cited:
- ABA Formal Opinion 340 (1975), ABA Informal Opinion 1418 (1978), and Vermont Opinion 77-6.
See also
- Vermont Ethics Op. 84-02: Lawyer married to the transaction's broker
- Vermont Ethics Op. 84-01: Police association counsel and criminal defense
Source
- Landing page: VBA conflict of interest opinions
- Original PDF: Vermont Advisory Opinion 82-08
- Rules history: Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct, “These rules apply to lawyer conduct after September 1, 1999.”
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1982. Ezel checks the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace