Must a Vermont lawyer serving as trustee place a family trust's assets in an approved IOLTA account?

Short answer Opinion 11-04 distinguishes a lawyer's separate fiduciary account from client-representation trust funds and does not require the family trust's assets to be held in an approved IOLTA institution.
Bar
VTBAR
Issued
2011

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2011. Ask about yours and see what the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2011
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A lawyer was named sole trustee of a client's family trust. After the client died, the trust was funded for the surviving spouse and later other family members. The lawyer planned to invest assets in mutual funds and pay income to the spouse under the trust's terms and Vermont's Uniform Prudent Investor Act.

The committee distinguished a lawyer's trust account for money held through legal representation from a fiduciary account arising through service as trustee. It read Rules 1.15A and 1.15B as applying the pooled-interest and approved-institution requirements to the former, not this separate fiduciary role. The lawyer still had to comply with the trust, prudent-investor law, and other rules on maintaining fiduciary accounts.

The opinion explained that Vermont's June 2009 rule amendments removed former Rule 1.15C language that had created a possible conflict between professional-conduct rules and fiduciary duties.

In practice

For the family trust described, the committee allowed investments outside Professional Responsibility Board approved institutions and required distribution of income according to the trust. It did not treat the trust's investment income as pooled-interest proceeds payable to the Vermont Bar Foundation.

Common questions

Q: Did the lawyer trustee have to put the trust's assets in IOLTA?

A: No. The committee said the IOLTA rule addressed funds held as a result of client representation, while the described assets were held in a separate fiduciary capacity.

Q: Could the trustee use mutual funds outside approved banks?

A: The committee said the lawyer was not limited to approved financial institutions for this fiduciary trust and had to comply with the trust and Vermont prudent-investor law.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interpreted Vermont Rules 1.15, 1.15A, and 1.15B alongside 14A V.S.A. Chapter 9, Vermont's Uniform Prudent Investor Act. It relied on the rules' separate definitions of representation trust accounts and fiduciary accounts.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15, 1.15A, and 1.15B
  • Former Rule 1.15C, discussed as removed in 2009

Statutes:

  • 14A V.S.A. Chapter 9, Vermont Uniform Prudent Investor Act

See also

Source

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2011. Ezel checks the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace