VSB July 17, 1972

Must a lawyer report another attorney's misconduct to the bar when the lawyer learned of it from a client in confidence and the client refuses to consent to disclosure?

Short answer: The committee concluded it is improper to report another attorney's unethical conduct to the bar when the information was obtained from a client in confidence and the client refuses to consent to the disclosure. Decided under Virginia's former Code.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1972. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1972
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The committee addressed the tension between the duty to report another lawyer's misconduct and the duty of confidentiality. It concluded it is improper to report information concerning another attorney's unethical conduct to the bar when that information was obtained from a client in confidence and the client refuses to consent to its disclosure, citing DR 4-101(C)(1) and DR 1-103(A).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1972, under Virginia's former Code of Professional Responsibility, before the Virginia State Bar's adoption of the Rules of Professional Conduct effective January 1, 2000. The committee note states that Rule 1.6(c)(3) requires lawyers to consult with their clients in these circumstances. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did the lawyer have to report the other attorney's misconduct?

A: Under this 1972 opinion, no, where the information came from a client in confidence and the client refused to consent. The committee found reporting improper in that situation.

Q: Which duty controlled, reporting or confidentiality?

A: The committee resolved the conflict in favor of the client's confidence, citing DR 4-101(C)(1) and the reporting provision DR 1-103(A). The committee note adds that current Rule 1.6(c)(3) requires consulting the client.

Background and rules framework

The opinion applied the former Code's confidentiality provision DR 4-101(C)(1) against its misconduct-reporting provision DR 1-103(A). The committee note maps the question onto current Virginia Rule 1.6(c)(3), corresponding to ABA Model Rule 8.3 (reporting professional misconduct) and its confidentiality limit drawn from ABA Model Rule 1.6.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • DR 4-101(C)(1) (confidences and secrets) (former Code)
  • DR 1-103(A) (reporting misconduct) (former Code)
  • Virginia Rule 1.6(c)(3) (consulting the client) (cited in the committee note)
  • ABA Model Rule 8.3 (reporting professional misconduct)
  • ABA Model Rule 1.6 (confidentiality of information)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 217

REPORTING VIOLATIONS BY OTHER ATTORNEY – CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.

It is improper for an attorney to report to the Bar information concerning unethical conduct by another attorney when such information was obtained from a client in confidence and the client refuses to consent to the disclosure thereof [See II: DR:4-101(C)(1) and DR:1-103(A).]

Committee Opinion
July 17, 1972

Legal Ethics Committee Notes. – Rule 1.6(c)(3) requires that lawyers consult with their clients in these circumstances.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1972 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.