VSB December 19, 1988

Can a lawyer hold a client's file or work product until the legal fee is paid?

Short answer: The committee concluded that whether 'applicable law' lets an attorney retain a client's papers or work product is a legal question outside its purview, but that even where the law permits retention, doing so may be unreasonable in some circumstances and violate DR 2-108(D)'s duty to take reasonable steps to protect the client's interests, judged case by case. It was decided under Virginia's former Code of Professional Responsibility.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The inquiry asked whether an attorney may retain his work product prepared for a client (written memoranda of law, copies of cases and statutes) until the legal fee is paid in full, and posed the same question about the client's own documents delivered to the attorney.

The committee quoted DR 2-108(D), which requires the lawyer, on terminating representation, to take reasonable steps to protect the client's interests (reasonable notice, time for other counsel, delivering all papers and property to which the client is entitled, and refunding unearned advance fees), while allowing the lawyer to "retain papers relating to the client to the extent permitted by applicable law." It concluded that whether applicable law permits retaining work-product papers or the client's papers is a legal question beyond its province.

The committee added that even if applicable law permits retention, doing so may be unreasonable in certain circumstances and thereby violate the first sentence of DR 2-108(D), because it could be inconsistent with taking reasonable steps to protect the client's interests. It said whether retention is unreasonable, even when permitted by law, can be decided only case by case, considering such things as the client's ability to pay the fee, whether the fee is in dispute, and the harm to the client from retaining the papers.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1988, under Virginia's former Code of Professional Responsibility (the disciplinary rule it cites), before the Virginia State Bar's adoption of the Rules of Professional Conduct effective January 1, 2000. As the committee note observes, current Rule 1.16(e) governs a lawyer's duty to provide files to a former client. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer keep a client's file until the fee is paid?

A: Under this 1988 opinion, the committee said whether applicable law permits retaining the papers is a legal question it could not answer, but that even lawful retention may be unreasonable in some circumstances and violate DR 2-108(D).

Q: What factors decide whether retention is unreasonable?

A: The committee said the determination is case by case, considering the client's ability to pay, whether the fee is in dispute, and the harm to the client if the papers are retained.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interpreted former Virginia DR 2-108(D) (reasonable steps to protect a client's interests on termination, including delivering papers and property to which the client is entitled, while allowing retention to the extent permitted by applicable law). The duty to provide a former client's file is now within Virginia Rule 1.16(e).

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Former Virginia DR 2-108(D) (protecting client interests on termination; retention to the extent permitted by law)
  • ABA Model Rule 1.16 (declining or terminating representation; returning the file)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

Committee Opinion
December 19, 1988
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1176

FEES: RETENTION OF CLIENT FILES
UNTIL FEES ARE PAID.

You have asked whether an attorney may retain his work product prepared for a client (e.g., written memoranda of law, copies of cases and statutes, etc.) until his legal fee has been paid in full. You have also made the same inquiry as it concerns various documents of the client which the client provided the attorney.

Disciplinary Rule 2-108(D), states as follows:

Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take reasonable steps for the continued protection of a client's interests, including giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, delivering all papers and property to which the client is entitled, and refunding any advance payment of fee that has not been earned. The lawyer may retain papers relating to the client to the extent permitted by applicable law.

Whether or not "applicable law" permits the attorney to retain work product papers relating to the client or the client's papers which were delivered to the attorney, is a legal question which is beyond the province of this Committee to answer.

Even if applicable law permits the attorney to retain papers relating to the client, the Committee opines that to do so, under certain circumstances, may be unreasonable, and thereby violate the first sentence of DR:2-108(D). That is, under certain circumstances retention of papers relating to the client may be inconsistent with taking "reasonable steps for the continued protection of a client's interests ...." Determination of whether or not retention of papers is unreasonable, even when permitted by applicable law, can only be made on a case-by-case basis, considering such things as the ability of the client to pay the fee, whether the fee is in dispute and the harm to the client if papers are retained.

Committee Opinion
December 19, 1988

Legal Ethics Committee Notes. – Rule 1.16(e) governs a lawyer’s duty to provide files to a former client.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.