TX 1953

Can a lawyer who drafts a client's will be named in it as executor and estate attorney, and can the lawyer also be named a beneficiary?

Short answer: The Committee held (9-0) that a drafting lawyer may be named executor and attorney for the estate if no pressure is brought on the client and the appointments reflect the client's true desire, but held (7-1) that naming the same lawyer a beneficiary would create a possible conflict of interest and is improper.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1953. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The inquiry asked two questions: whether a lawyer who draws a will for a client may be named in that will as executor and also as attorney for the estate; and whether it would be a violation if, in addition, the lawyer were named a beneficiary under the will.

On the first question, the Committee was of the view that there is no violation in a lawyer being named executor and attorney for the estate, provided there is no pressure brought to bear on the client and such appointments represent the true desire of the client (9-0).

On the second question, the Committee concluded that where the lawyer is also to be named a beneficiary under the will, there would be a possible conflict of interest, and it would be improper for the lawyer to prepare such a will (7-1).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1953, under the former Texas Canons of Ethics, which the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct replaced effective January 1, 1990. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Can the lawyer who drafts a will serve as both executor and estate attorney under this opinion?

A: Yes, provided no pressure is brought to bear on the client and the appointments represent the client's true desire (9-0).

Q: Can that same lawyer also be named a beneficiary in the will?

A: No. The Committee found that naming the drafting lawyer a beneficiary presents a possible conflict of interest, making it improper to prepare such a will (7-1).

Q: What was the dividing line in the opinion?

A: The Committee separated the fiduciary and service roles (executor and attorney), which it allowed when freely chosen by the client, from a personal financial benefit (beneficiary), which it treated as a conflict.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets former Texas Canon 6 (adverse influences and conflicting interests), applied to a lawyer who drafts a will and is named in it. The modern analogs are ABA Model Rule 1.7 (conflicts of interest) for the executor and attorney roles, and Model Rule 1.8 (specifically the limit on a lawyer preparing an instrument giving the lawyer a substantial gift) for the beneficiary question.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

MR 1.7 (conflict of interest: current clients), as the modern analog
MR 1.8 (lawyer preparing an instrument giving the lawyer a substantial gift), as the modern analog
Texas Canon 6 (adverse influences and conflicting interests)

Source

Landing page: https://www.legalethicstexas.com/resources/opinions/opinion-71/
Original PDF: https://tcle-web.s3.amazonaws.com/public/documents/Opinion_71.pdf

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION PRESENTED

Is it a violation of the Texas Canons of Ethics for a lawyer to draw a will for a client, in which will such lawyer is named as the executor and also as the attorney for the estate?
Is it a violation of any of the Texas Canons of Ethics for a lawyer to draw such will if, in addition to the facts stated in (1) hereof, said lawyer is also named as a beneficiary under the terms of the will?

18 Baylor L. Rev. 226 (1966)

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS - WILLS
An attorney who draws a will for a client may be named in the will as executor and attorney for the estate, provided no pressure is brought to bear on the client, and the appointments represent the client's desire.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS - WILLS
An attorney who draws a will for a client and is named in the will as executor and attorney for the estate, may not also be named as a beneficiary under the will.

Canon 6.

The committee is of the view that there is no violation of the Canons of Ethics for a lawyer to be named as executor and attorney for the estate, provided there is no pressure brought to bear on the client, and such appointments represent the true desire of the client. (9-0)
The committee is of the view that where the lawyer is also to be named as a beneficiary under the will, there would be a possible conflict of interest and it would be improper for the lawyer to prepare such will. (7-1)

Tex. Comm. On Professional Ethics, Op. 71 (1953)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1953 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.