TX February 1, 2013

Can a Texas lawyer phone a real estate agent's client who asked the agent to have the lawyer call, even when the lawyer gives the agent ordinary holiday gifts?

Short answer: Per the Committee, yes. Because the client requested the call through the agent, the lawyer is not soliciting someone who has not sought the lawyer's services, so Rule 7.03 and the barratry rule (Rule 8.04(a)(9)) are not violated. Customary, non-excessive entertainment and holiday gifts to the agent that are unrelated to recommending or hiring the lawyer are not payment for solicitation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2013
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A lawyer represents a title insurance company, and a real estate agent works frequently with the lawyer on title matters. The agent's client, needing a lawyer for an unrelated matter, asks the agent to find one; the agent suggests the lawyer, and the client asks the agent to have the lawyer call. The lawyer calls, and the client hires the lawyer. Separately, the lawyer customarily entertains and gives small holiday gifts to business acquaintances, including this agent, consistent with community practice and unrelated to recommending or hiring the lawyer.

The Committee frames two issues: whether the lawyer engaged in prohibited contact with a potential client, and whether the lawyer made prohibited payments to another person for soliciting employment. It sets out Rule 7.03(a) (barring in-person or regulated telephone or electronic contact to seek employment from someone who has not sought the lawyer's advice and with whom the lawyer has no family or prior client relationship, when a significant motive is pecuniary gain), Rule 7.03(b) (no paying a non-lawyer for soliciting or referring clients), and Rule 7.03(c) (no paying anything of value to solicit employment). It also sets out Rule 8.04(a)(9) (no conduct constituting barratry) and quotes the barratry definition in Texas Penal Code section 38.12, including the exception in section 38.12(c) for conduct authorized by the Disciplinary Rules or a rule of court.

Applying these, the Committee concludes the conduct violates neither Rule 7.03 nor Rule 8.04(a)(9). Because the client asked the agent to have the lawyer call, the lawyer's call is to a person who has sought the lawyer's services, not unsought contact for employment. And the customary entertainment and small holiday gifts to the agent do not violate the rules so long as they are not excessive by community standards and are not related to recommending or hiring the lawyer; in those circumstances the lawyer has not transferred anything of value to anyone for the purpose of soliciting employment.

In practice

Under this opinion, and under the Texas rules as they stood at the time, a lawyer may return a call to a prospective client who, through an intermediary such as a real estate agent, asked the lawyer to call, because the prospective client has sought the lawyer's services and the contact is therefore outside Rule 7.03(a)'s prohibition and not barratry under Rule 8.04(a)(9). The Committee holds that a lawyer's customary, community-standard entertainment and small holiday gifts to a business acquaintance who happens to refer a client do not violate Rule 7.03(b) or (c) or the barratry rule, provided the gifts are not excessive and are not related to recommending or employing the lawyer, so they are not a payment of value for soliciting employment.

Common questions

Q: Can I call a prospective client who asked, through a real estate agent, that I call them?

A: Per Opinion 623, yes. Because the client requested the call, the lawyer is not seeking employment from someone who has not sought the lawyer's services, so Rule 7.03(a) is not violated.

Q: Do my ordinary holiday gifts to a referring agent count as paying for referrals?

A: No, under the facts here. The Committee concludes that customary, non-excessive entertainment and small holiday gifts that are not related to recommending or employing the lawyer are not a transfer of value for soliciting employment under Rule 7.03(b) or (c).

Q: Does this implicate the barratry rule?

A: No. The Committee finds neither unsought solicitation nor payment for solicitation, so the conduct is not barratry under Rule 8.04(a)(9), which incorporates Texas Penal Code section 38.12 (whose section 38.12(c) excepts conduct authorized by the Disciplinary Rules).

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Texas Disciplinary Rule 7.03(a), (b), and (c) (solicitation of clients and payment for soliciting or referring; ABA Model Rule 7.3) and Rule 8.04(a)(9) (conduct constituting barratry; ABA Model Rule 8.4), the latter incorporating the barratry definition and exceptions in Texas Penal Code section 38.12.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 7.3 (solicitation of clients); MR 8.4 (misconduct)
  • Texas Disciplinary Rules 7.03(a), 7.03(b), 7.03(c), 8.04(a)(9)

Statutes:

  • Texas Penal Code § 38.12 (Barratry and Solicitation of Professional Employment), including §§ 38.12(b)(3), 38.12(c), and 38.12(d)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION PRESENTED

Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, is a lawyer permitted to telephone a real estate agent’s client concerning possible legal employment after the real estate agent informs the lawyer that the client has requested the lawyer to call? Is this contact permitted if the real estate agent is included in a group of business acquaintances of the lawyer to whom the lawyer regularly provides entertainment and small holiday gifts that are consistent with customary community standards and that are not related to recommendation or employment of the lawyer?

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Lawyer represents a real estate title insurance company in real estate transactions. A real estate agent works frequently with Lawyer on title insurance matters. While working with a client in a real estate transaction, the real estate agent is asked by the agent’s client to help the client find a lawyer to work on a matter unrelated to the real estate transaction. After the real estate agent suggests Lawyer as someone who might be able to handle the transaction, the client asks the real estate agent to contact Lawyer and ask Lawyer to call the client. The real estate agent contacts Lawyer as requested by the client, and in response Lawyer calls the agent’s client. As a result of the call made by Lawyer the real estate agent’s client hires Lawyer to represent him in the matter.

In accord with customary practice in the community and to build personal goodwill with business acquaintances, Lawyer from time to time entertains and makes small holiday gifts to real estate agents and other persons with whom Lawyer has business dealings. The real estate agent who suggested Lawyer’s name to the agent’s client is among those receiving such entertainment and holiday gifts from Lawyer.

DISCUSSION

The issues under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct raised by the facts presented are whether Lawyer’s conduct involves prohibited contacts with potential clients to seek legal employment or prohibited payments to another person for soliciting legal employment. Rule 7.03 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules prohibits in the following terms, with exceptions not relevant in these circumstances, certain contacts by a lawyer with potential clients and payments by a lawyer for the purpose of soliciting legal employment:

"(a) A lawyer shall not by in-person contact, or by regulated telephone or other electronic contact as defined in paragraph (f) seek professional employment concerning a matter arising out of a particular occurrence or event, or series of occurrences or events, from a prospective client or nonclient who has not sought the lawyer’s advice regarding employment or with whom the lawyer has no family or past or present attorney-client relationship when a significant motive for the lawyer’s doing so is the lawyer’s pecuniary gain. . . . .
(b) A lawyer shall not pay, give, or offer to pay or give anything of value to a person not licensed to practice law for soliciting prospective clients for, or referring clients or prospective clients to, any lawyer or firm . . . .
(c) A lawyer, in order to solicit professional employment, shall not pay, give, advance, or offer to pay, give, or advance anything of value, other than actual litigation expenses and other financial assistance as permitted by Rule 1.08(d), to a prospective client or any other person . . . .
. . . .
(f) As used in paragraph (a), ‘regulated telephone or other electronic contact’ means any electronic communication initiated by a lawyer or by any person acting on behalf of a lawyer or law firm that will result in the person contacted communicating in a live, interactive manner with any other person by telephone or other electronic means. . . . .”

In addition, Rule 8.04(a)(9) provides that a lawyer shall not “engage in conduct that constitutes barratry as defined by the law of this state[.]" The term “barratry” is defined in section 38.12 of the Texas Penal Code, entitled “Barratry and Solicitation of Professional Employment,” as follows:

“(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to obtain an economic benefit the person:
(1) knowingly institutes a suit or claim that the person has not been authorized to pursue;
(2) solicits employment, either in person or by telephone, for himself or for another;
(3) pays, gives, or advances or offers to pay, give, or advance to a prospective client money or anything of value to obtain employment as a professional from the prospective client;
(4) pays or gives or offers to pay or give a person money or anything of value to solicit employment;
(5) pays or gives or offers to pay or give a family member of a prospective client money or anything of value to solicit employment; or
(6) accepts or agrees to accept money or anything of value to solicit employment.”

In addition, section 38.12(b)(3) of the Texas Penal Code provides that it is a violation of section 38.12 if a licensed person knowingly accepts professional employment that results from solicitation prohibited by section 38.12(a). Section 38.12(d) provides further that it is an offense for a lawyer to communicate in writing, in person or by telephone for the purpose of soliciting legal employment from someone who has not sought to employ the lawyer if the communication relates to certain specified circumstances or involves certain types of coercive or deceptive conduct. Section 38.12(c) provides that “[i]t is an exception to prosecution under Subsection (a) or (b) that the person's conduct is authorized by the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct or any rule of court.”

As relevant to the factual situation here considered, the actions that are prohibited by Rule 7.03 and Rule 8.04(a)(9) of the Texas Disciplinary Rules are (1) a lawyer’s personal contact for the purpose of obtaining legal employment with a potential client who has not requested the contact and (2) payment of anything of value by a lawyer to any person for the purpose of soliciting employment of the lawyer. In the opinion of the Committee, nothing in the circumstances considered constitutes either unsought contact by a lawyer for the purpose of obtaining employment or payment for solicitation of legal employment.

In the situation considered, the client asks the real estate agent to contact Lawyer and to request that Lawyer call the client. Since Lawyer’s call to the real estate agent’s client is requested by the real estate agent acting on behalf of the client, Lawyer is not calling to seek employment from a person who has not sought Lawyer’s services.

The fact that the real estate agent is among the recipients of entertainment or small holiday gifts from Lawyer does not result in a violation of Rules 7.03 and 8.04(a)(9) provided that the entertainment and gifts to the real estate agent are not excessive by community standards and are not related to recommendation or employment of Lawyer. In these circumstances it would not be possible to conclude that Lawyer had transferred anything of value to any person, including the real estate agent, for the purpose of soliciting legal employment.

CONCLUSION

Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is permitted to telephone a real estate agent’s client concerning possible legal employment after the real estate agent informs the lawyer that the client has requested the lawyer to call. This conclusion would not change if the real estate agent is included in a group of business acquaintances of the lawyer to whom the lawyer regularly provides entertainment and small holiday gifts that are consistent with customary community standards and that are not related to recommendation or employment of the lawyer.

Tex. Comm. On Professional Ethics, Op. 623 (2013)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2013 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.