TX October 1, 2010

Can a Texas lawyer turn over unclaimed funds held in trust to the state Comptroller as abandoned property, and report the owner's identifying information, without violating the trust-account and confidentiality rules?

Short answer: Per the Committee, yes. Nothing in the Rules prohibits delivering presumed-abandoned trust property to the Comptroller; Rule 1.14(b) requires delivery of property a third person is entitled to receive, and Rule 1.05(c)(4) permits revealing the confidential information a report requires, limited to what is necessary to comply with the Property Code.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The opinion addresses a lawyer holding funds or property in a trust account for a client or third party who, after three years of reasonable but unsuccessful efforts, cannot be located or identified. The question is whether the lawyer may deliver that property to the Texas Comptroller and file the reports required of a "holder" of presumed-abandoned property under the Texas Property Code.

The Committee notes it has no authority to interpret the Property Code, so it assumes for purposes of the opinion that a Texas lawyer could reasonably conclude the abandoned-property provisions apply to such trust property. On the delivery question, the Committee finds no Rule that limits or prohibits transferring presumed-abandoned property to the Comptroller. It reads the delivery as falling within Rule 1.14(b), which requires a lawyer to deliver to a third person any property that person is entitled to receive; so where the Property Code's delivery requirements apply, Rule 1.14(b) not only permits but requires delivery.

On the reporting question, the Committee applies Rule 1.05. Much of the owner-identifying information a report calls for (name, social security number, driver's license number, email, last known address) is confidential information under Rule 1.05(a). Rule 1.05(c)(4) authorizes revealing confidential information when the lawyer has reason to believe it is necessary to comply with another law. Filing a report the lawyer reasonably believes is required by the abandoned-property statute therefore does not violate Rule 1.05, but the authorization extends only to disclosures that are "necessary" for compliance; the lawyer must not disclose more than the law requires.

In practice

Under this opinion, and under the Texas rules as they stood at the time, a lawyer who reasonably concludes that trust-account property is presumed abandoned under the Texas Property Code may deliver it to the Comptroller and file the accompanying owner-information report. The Committee frames delivery as required by Rule 1.14(b) once the Property Code's delivery obligation applies, and treats the reporting disclosure as permitted by Rule 1.05(c)(4) because it is necessary to comply with law. The opinion limits the disclosure to what compliance requires, citing Comment 14 to Rule 1.05 that "a disclosure adverse to the client's interest should be no greater than the lawyer believes necessary to the purpose."

Common questions

Q: Can a Texas lawyer hand over unclaimed trust funds to the Comptroller without the owner's consent?

A: Yes. Opinion 602 finds no Rule that prohibits delivering presumed-abandoned trust property to the Comptroller, and reads Rule 1.14(b) to require delivery where the Property Code's delivery requirements apply.

Q: Does filing the owner-information report violate the duty of confidentiality?

A: No. The Committee acknowledges that the report's owner-identifying data is confidential information under Rule 1.05(a), but Rule 1.05(c)(4) permits revealing it when the lawyer reasonably believes doing so is necessary to comply with another law, such as the abandoned-property statute.

Q: How much information may the lawyer disclose in the report?

A: Only what compliance requires. The opinion stresses that Rule 1.05(c)(4) authorizes "necessary" disclosures and that, per Comment 14 to Rule 1.05, an adverse disclosure should be no greater than necessary to the purpose.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Texas Disciplinary Rule 1.14 (safekeeping property of clients and third persons), which corresponds to ABA Model Rule 1.15, and Texas Disciplinary Rule 1.05 (confidentiality of information), which corresponds to ABA Model Rule 1.6. Rule 1.14(b) requires a lawyer to promptly deliver to a client or third person any property that person is entitled to receive. Rule 1.05(c)(4) permits revealing confidential information when the lawyer has reason to believe it is necessary to comply with a court order, a Disciplinary Rule, or other law. The opinion also discusses, without interpreting, the abandoned-property provisions of the Texas Property Code that make a "holder" deliver and report presumed-abandoned property.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 1.15 (safekeeping property)
  • MR 1.6 (confidentiality of information)
  • Texas Disciplinary Rule 1.14 (safekeeping property of clients and third persons)
  • Texas Disciplinary Rule 1.05 (confidentiality of information), including 1.05(a), 1.05(c)(4), and Comment 14

Statutes:

  • Texas Property Code sections 72.001(e), 72.101(a), 74.101, 74.103, and 74.301(a) (abandoned-property holder, delivery, and reporting requirements)

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION PRESENTED

Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, may a lawyer deliver to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, and file related reports concerning, funds or other property held in the lawyer’s trust account for which the lawyer is unable to locate or to identify the owner?

STATEMENT OF FACTS

A lawyer holds in his trust account funds or other property belonging to a client or a third party. After three years, despite reasonable efforts, the lawyer either is unable to locate the client or third party that is the owner of the funds or other property or is unable to determine the identity of the owner.

DISCUSSION

Rule 1.14 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct sets forth a lawyer’s obligations regarding funds and other property belonging to clients or third persons. Among other requirements, Rule 1.14(a) requires that a lawyer holding such funds keep the funds in a separate trust or escrow account and that “[c]omplete records of such account funds and other property shall be kept by the lawyer and shall be preserved for a period of five years after termination of the representation.” Rule 1.14(b) provides:
“Upon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has an interest, a lawyer shall promptly notify the client or third person. Except as stated in this rule or otherwise permitted by law or by agreement with the client, a lawyer shall promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person, shall promptly render a full accounting regarding such property.”
Further, Rule 1.14(c) includes the requirement that “[a]ll funds in a trust or escrow account shall be disbursed only to those persons entitled to receive them by virtue of the representation or by law.”

Section 72.001(e) of the Texas Property Code defines a “holder” of property as “a person, wherever organized or domiciled, who is: (1) in possession of property that belongs to another; (2) a trustee; or (3) indebted to another on an obligation.” Section 72.101(a) of the Texas Property Code provides that, with exceptions not here relevant:
“. . . personal property is presumed abandoned if, for longer than three years: (1) the existence and location of the owner of the property is unknown to the holder of the property; and (2) according to the knowledge and records of the holder of the property, a claim to the property has not been asserted or an act of ownership of the property has not been exercised.”
Section 74.301(a) of the Texas Property Code states, in relevant part, that “each holder who on June 30 holds property that is presumed abandoned under Chapter 72, 73, or 75 shall deliver the property to the comptroller on or before the following November 1 accompanied by the report required to be filed under Section 74.101.” Under section 74.101(a) of the Texas Property Code, each holder of property presumed abandoned under chapter 72 (which includes section 72.101(a) quoted above) “shall file a report of that property . . . .” with the Comptroller of Public Accounts. Section 74.101(c) requires that the report include, if known by the holder, certain identifying information about each person who appears to be the owner of the property or any person who is entitled to the property. Under section 74.103 of the Texas Property Code, a holder of property who is required to make such a report must keep for ten years certain records concerning reported property and persons who appear to be owners of such property.

Although this Committee does not have authority to interpret statutory law and no opinion is here offered as to the interpretation of the provisions of the Texas Property Code cited above, for purposes of this opinion the Committee assumes a Texas lawyer could reasonably conclude that in certain circumstances these provisions apply to property held in his trust account for which the owner of the property cannot be located or cannot be identified.

No provision of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct limits or prohibits the transfer to the Texas Comptroller of funds or property that a lawyer reasonably believes to be “presumed abandoned” under the Texas Property Code. Any delivery of funds required by provisions of the Texas Property Code will be within the scope of Rule 1.14(b), which requires, with exceptions not here applicable, that “a lawyer shall promptly deliver to the . . . third person any funds or other property that the . . . third person is entitled to receive . . . .” Accordingly, if a lawyer concludes that he holds property subject to the delivery requirements of the Texas Property Code, Rule 1.14(b) of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct not only permits but requires the lawyer to deliver such funds or property to the Comptroller in accordance with the Property Code’s requirements.

With respect to the filing of reports with the Comptroller on property required to be transferred to the Comptroller under the Texas Property Code, it is necessary to consider the requirements of Rule 1.05 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct concerning confidential information relating to a lawyer’s representation of current and former clients. Rule 1.05(a) defines “confidential information” to include both “privileged information” and “unprivileged client information.” The latter category is broadly defined in Rule 1.05(a) to mean “all information relating to a client or furnished by the client, other than privileged information, acquired by the lawyer during the course of or by reason of the representation of the client.”

Much of the information called for in a report to the Comptroller under section 74.101 of the Texas Property Code appears to come within the definition of “confidential information” under Rule 1.05(a), including, for example, the name, social security number, driver’s license number, e-mail address, and last known address of the client or other person to whom the property is believed to belong.

Rule 1.05(c)(4) expressly authorizes a lawyer to reveal confidential information “[w]hen the lawyer has reason to believe it is necessary to do so in order to comply with a court order, a Texas Disciplinary Rule of Professional Conduct, or other law.” (emphasis added) Thus, if a lawyer files a report containing confidential client information that the lawyer reasonably believes is required under provisions of the Texas Property Code concerning abandoned property, filing such report would not violate the lawyer’s obligations regarding confidentiality under Rule 1.05. It must be emphasized that this authorization applies only to disclosures that are “necessary” for compliance with applicable law. Particularly in view of the general obligation imposed by Rule 1.05 for lawyers not to reveal confidential information acquired in the representation of clients unless an exception such as Rule 1.05(c)(4) applies, the lawyer must take care not to make disclosures that exceed what is required to comply with applicable law. As noted in Comment 14 to Rule 1.05, “ . . . a disclosure adverse to the client’s interest should be no greater than the lawyer believes necessary to the purpose.”

CONCLUSION

Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is permitted to deliver to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, and to file required reports concerning, funds or other property held in the lawyer’s trust account for which the lawyer is unable to locate or to identify the owner, provided the lawyer reasonably believes that such action is required by applicable provisions of Texas law on abandoned property.

Tex. Comm. On Professional Ethics, Op. 602 (2010)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2010 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.