TX 1948

When a lawyer leaving public office puts out a newspaper notice that he won't seek re-election, can it praise his legal skills or hint at taking new clients?

Short answer: The Committee held unanimously (7-0) that such a notice may factually report the lawyer's public service, but may not extol his professional attainments or ability, emphasize his special familiarity with any phase of the law, or include language understandable as solicitation; Canons 24 and 39 prohibit such laudation and solicitation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1948. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1948
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The inquiry asked whether a lawyer who had held public office, in a newspaper announcement that he would not be a candidate for re-election and that also factually reported his services as a public officer, should include any language that extolled his professional attainments or ability, emphasized his special familiarity with a phase of the practice of law, or could be understood as a solicitation of business.

The committee answered that Canons 24 and 39 prohibit any such laudation and solicitation. A factual report of the lawyer's public service was the limit; the announcement could not cross into praising his legal skills or soliciting clients. The vote was 7-0.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1948, under the former Texas Canons of Ethics, which the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct replaced effective January 1, 1990. Lawyer advertising and solicitation restrictions were also reshaped by later constitutional decisions beginning with Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977). Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis; communications about a lawyer's services are now addressed by ABA Model Rule 7.1. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could the announcement describe the lawyer's record in office?

A: Yes, as a factual report. The committee allowed a factual account of the lawyer's public service; the problem was language going beyond that.

Q: What could the announcement not say?

A: It could not extol the lawyer's professional attainments or ability, emphasize his special familiarity with any phase of the law, or include language that could be understood as soliciting business.

Q: Which Canons applied?

A: Texas Canons 24 (solicitation) and 39 (professional card). The committee held both prohibited the laudation and solicitation at issue, by a 7-0 vote.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets former Texas Canon 24 (solicitation, direct or indirect) and Canon 39 (professional card), applied to a public-officeholder lawyer's newspaper announcement that he would not seek re-election. The modern analog is ABA Model Rule 7.1 (communications concerning a lawyer's services), which forbids false or misleading communications.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • MR 7.1 (communications concerning a lawyer's services), as the modern analog
  • Texas Canons 24 and 39

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

QUESTION PRESENTED

Whether a lawyer who has been holding public office, in a newspaper announcement that he will not be a candidate for re-election, and which is also a factual report of his services as such public officer, should include therein any language which amounts to extolling his professional attainments or ability, or emphasizes his special familiarity with any phase of the practice of law, or is susceptible of being understood as a solicitation of business.

18 Baylor L. Rev. 200 (1966)

SOLICITATION - PROFESSIONAL LISTINGS - NEWSPAPER ANNOUNCEMENTS
A newspaper announcement that an attorney who has been holding public office will not be a candidate for re-election, and which factually reports his services as a public officer, may not extol his professional attainments or ability, or emphasize his special familiarity with a phase of the Law, or include language susceptible of being understood as solicitation.

Canons 24, 39.

Canons 24 and 39 prohibit any such laudation and solicitation. (7-0)

Tex. Comm. On Professional Ethics, Op. 14 (1948)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1948 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.