Can a North Dakota prosecutor accept a small thank-you gift from a crime victim, and do the ethics rules address it?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what the current North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An assistant state's attorney prosecuted an assault-and-burglary case to a guilty verdict. After the verdict and before sentencing, the victim dropped off a thank-you card for the prosecutor and a victim/witness advocate, enclosing a $30 gift certificate. The prosecutor asked the committee what ethical obligation governed accepting the gift.
The committee concluded that none of North Dakota's Rules of Professional Conduct address the question. It pointed the prosecutor to N.D.C.C. 11-16-05 but explained that interpreting the Century Code is outside its authority; its role is to interpret and apply the Rules of Professional Conduct. The committee suggested the prosecutor request an Attorney General opinion on the statute, and noted that a violation of the Century Code may be considered misconduct under Rule 8.4. Its formal conclusion was that the Rules of Professional Conduct do not address the request.
In practice
The committee declined to resolve the gift question under the Rules of Professional Conduct, concluding that no rule addresses it. Under this opinion, the issue is statutory rather than one the ethics rules answer; the committee directed the prosecutor to N.D.C.C. 11-16-05 and to a possible Attorney General opinion, and observed only that a statutory violation could itself amount to misconduct under Rule 8.4.
Common questions
Q: Do North Dakota's ethics rules say whether a prosecutor can accept a gift from a victim?
A: No. The committee concluded that none of the Rules of Professional Conduct address the acceptance of the gift certificate.
Q: Where did the committee point the prosecutor instead?
A: To N.D.C.C. 11-16-05. The committee said interpreting that statute is outside its authority and suggested the prosecutor seek an Attorney General opinion on it.
Q: Could accepting the gift still lead to discipline?
A: Possibly, but only through a statute. The committee noted that a violation of the Century Code may be treated as misconduct under Rule 8.4, but it did not decide whether any violation occurred.
Background and rules framework
The committee found no Rule of Professional Conduct on point and identified the question as one arising under the North Dakota Century Code rather than the ethics rules. It referenced Rule 8.4 (Model Rule 8.4) only to note that a statutory violation could constitute professional misconduct, and pointed to N.D.C.C. 11-16-05 as the provision the prosecutor should consult, potentially through an Attorney General opinion.
The opinion is issued under North Dakota Rule for Lawyer Discipline 1.2(B), the safe-harbor provision protecting good-faith reliance on a written ethics-committee opinion.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Model Rule 8.4 / N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 8.4 (misconduct), referenced only as a possible consequence of a statutory violation
- N.D.R. Lawyer Discipline 1.2(B) (safe harbor for reliance on a committee opinion)
Statutes:
- N.D.C.C. 11-16-05 (cited as the provision governing the question; the committee declined to interpret it)
See also
- ABA Formal Op. 469: Prosecutors and Debt Collectors
- ABA Formal Op. 467: Prosecutor Supervisory Duties
Source
- Landing page: https://www.sband.org/page/ethics_opinions
- Original PDF: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.sband.org/resource/resmgr/docs/for_lawyers/opinion_05-08.pdf
Original opinion text
Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.
STATE BAR ASSOCIATION OF NORTH DAKOTA
ETHICS COMMITTEE
Opinion No. 05-08
The requesting attorney (an Assistant State’s Attorney) seeks the Committee’s guidance relating to a gift received from a victim. I. FACTS.
An Assistant State’s Attorney (ASA) sent a letter requesting an opinion or advisory letter from the Ethics Committee. The request stated that the ASA was involved in a jury trial where the allegations involved an assault and burglary. The defendant was found guilty by a jury and, at the time of the request, a sentencing hearing was scheduled. Following the jury trial and the guilty verdict, the victim in the case dropped off a card for both the ASA and a victim/witness advocate who assisted the victim. The card thanked both the ASA and the advocate for the work they put into the case, and enclosed within the card was a $30 gift certificate. The request asked what the ASA’s ethical obligation is regarding acceptance of the gift certificate.
Il. DISCUSSION.
The issue is whether the ASA may accept the gift certificate. It does not appear to the Committee that any of North Dakota’s Rules of Professional Conduct address this issue. It does appear to the Committee, however, that N.D.C.C. § 11-16-05 may address this issue and the requesting attorney is directed to that section. It is not the Committee’s duty, or within its power, to interpret the North Dakota Century Code but to
interpret and apply the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct. If the ASA has a
concern with respect to compliance with a statute, the Committee suggests that an Attorney General’s opinion be requested with respect to issues surrounding the interpretation of that statute. The Committee also suggests that the ASA be aware that a violation of the Century Code may be considered misconduct under Rule 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Ill. CONCLUSION.
North Dakota’s Rules of Professional Conduct do not address the request from the ASA.
This opinion is provided pursuant to North Dakota Rule for Lawyer Discipline 1.2(B), which provides:
A lawyer who acts with good faith and reasonable reliance on a written
opinion or advisory letter of the ethics committee of the association is not
subject to sanction for violation of the North Dakota Rules of Professional
Conduct as to the conduct that is the subject of the opinion or advisory
letter.
This Opinion was drafted by Anthony J. Weiler and was adopted by the
Committee on October 18, 2005, by a majority vote.
Parransen Chair ™
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace