Can I charge nonclient adversaries a court-equivalent fee for photocopies of nonconfidential public-record documents produced on behalf of my clients?

Short answer The Panel perceives no violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct in the attorney's proposed conduct -- charging nonclient adversaries a fee equivalent to a court's charge for photocopies of public-record documents that are not protected by the confidentiality rule.
Bar
RIEAP
Issued
September 14, 1993

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what the current Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
How much weight this carries: Under the Ethics Advisory Panel rules of the Rhode Island Supreme Court, a lawyer who asks for an opinion, gives the facts fully and accurately, and acts in accordance with it is conclusively presumed to have complied with the Rules of Professional Conduct. Source.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The inquiring attorney asked whether he or she may charge nonclients a fee for photocopies of documents produced on behalf of clients that are not protected by the confidentiality rule. The proposed fee would be equivalent to those charged by a particular court for the same service. The documents are public records, and the nonclients are potential adversaries of the attorney's clients.

The opinion states that the Panel perceives no violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct by the attorney's proposed conduct.

In practice

Under this opinion, the proposed practice -- charging potential adversaries a court-equivalent photocopy fee for public-record documents that are not confidential -- does not, on the facts presented, violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. The opinion resolves the inquiry with a single conclusion and does not identify any rule that the conduct offends.

Common questions

Q: Can a lawyer charge an opposing party for copies of public-record documents?

A: On these facts, yes. The opinion perceives no violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct in charging nonclient adversaries a court-equivalent fee for copies of nonconfidential public records.

Q: Does it matter that the documents were produced on behalf of the lawyer's clients?

A: The opinion notes the documents are public records and not protected by the confidentiality rule, and finds no violation in charging for copies of them.

Background and rules framework

The opinion resolves the inquiry without citing a specific Rule of Professional Conduct, concluding only that the Panel perceives no violation in the proposed conduct. It frames the documents as public records that are not protected by the confidentiality rule.

Citations and references

The opinion does not cite a specific Rule of Professional Conduct.

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

(FINAL)
ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
OPINION #93-75, REQUEST #416
Issued September 14, 1993

The inquiring attorney asks whether he/she may charge nonclients a fee for photocopies of documents produced on behalf of clients that are not protected by the confidentiality rule. The fee would be equivalent to those charged by a particular court for the same service. The documents are public records and the nonclients are potential adversaries of the inquiring attorney's clients.

The Panel perceives no violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct by the inquiring attorney's proposed conduct.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1993. Ezel checks the current Rhode Island Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace