My stationery shows my name with an asterisk noting I'm only admitted in one state, not Rhode Island. Is that letterhead proper?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current rules of professional conduct in your state, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An attorney asked the panel whether he could properly sign letters on stationery that listed his name followed by an asterisk, where the stationery clearly identified him as a member of one particular state bar association only.
The panel explained that DR 2-102(D) allows lawyers licensed in different jurisdictions to form and continue a partnership, provided the firm's letterhead and other permissible listings "make clear the jurisdictional limitations on those members and associates of the firm not licensed to practice in all listed jurisdictions." Because the stationery in question clearly indicated the attorney was a member of one state bar association and not a member of the Rhode Island Bar Association, the panel found it perfectly proper under the Code of Professional Responsibility.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1988, before the Rhode Island Supreme Court's adoption of the 2007 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct, and it applies the ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility's Disciplinary Rules then in effect. Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Can my letterhead identify me as a lawyer if I'm not admitted in Rhode Island but I'm a member of another state's bar?
A: Yes, according to this opinion, as long as the stationery clearly discloses the jurisdictional limitation, here by an asterisk clarifying the attorney's membership in only one particular state bar association.
Q: What does DR 2-102(D) require of a firm's letterhead when its lawyers are licensed in different jurisdictions?
A: The opinion quotes DR 2-102(D) as requiring that the letterhead and other permissible listings "make clear the jurisdictional limitations on those members and associates of the firm not licensed to practice in all listed jurisdictions."
Background and rules framework
The opinion applies DR 2-102(D) of the ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility, then in force in Rhode Island, which governs how a firm's letterhead must disclose jurisdictional limitations for lawyers not licensed in every jurisdiction listed.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- RI DR 2-102(D) (letterhead disclosure of jurisdictional limitations for lawyers not licensed in all listed jurisdictions)
Statutes:
- None cited.
Cases:
- None cited.
Other opinions cited:
- None cited.
See also
No sibling opinions yet indexed.
Source
- Landing page: https://www.courts.ri.gov/attorney-resources/Pages/Ethics-Advisory-Panel-default.aspx
- Original PDF: https://www.courts.ri.gov/Opinions/EAP%2088-03.pdf
Original opinion text
Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.
DIGEST OF ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
OPINION #88-3, Request #25
ISSUED APRIL 15, 1988
An attorney seeks Panel advice as to whether he may properly sign letters on certain stationery. The stationery he submits includes his name, followed by an asterisk. The attorney is clearly identified as being a member of one particular state bar association only.
Disciplinary Rule 2-102(D) provides that lawyers licensed in different jurisdictions may form and continue a partnership provided the firm's letterhead and other permissible listings "make clear the jurisdictional limitations on those members and associates of the firm not licensed to practice in all listed jurisdictions . . ." Since the stationery clearly indicates that the attorney is a member of one state bar association and not a member of the Rhode Island Bar Association, it is perfectly proper under the Code of Professional Responsibility.
Ethics Advisory Panel advice is protective in nature. There is no requirement that an attorney abide by a Panel opinion, but if he or she does, he or she is fully protected from any charge of impropriety.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1988 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current rules of professional conduct in your state and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.