Can a lawyer give a second opinion to someone already represented by another lawyer, and may the lawyer tell that other lawyer about the request?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2026. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Lawyer A is approached by a potential client who says they are unhappy with the work Lawyer B is doing and asks Lawyer A for a second opinion. The opinion asks whether Lawyer A may provide the second opinion and whether Lawyer A may inform Lawyer B of the request.
On the first question, the opinion answers yes. Oregon RPC 4.2 bars a lawyer who is representing a client or the lawyer's own interests from communicating with a person the lawyer knows to be represented, absent consent or other authority. But the rule applies when the lawyer is representing a client or the lawyer's own interests in a matter, not when the lawyer is approached by a prospective client. Neither RPC 4.2 nor its predecessor has ever been read to bar a lawyer from giving a second opinion to a represented party. The opinion cites the Restatement and ABA Model Rule 4.2 comment [4], under which a lawyer not otherwise representing a client in the matter may respond to a represented person seeking a second opinion, including an opinion on the propriety of the first lawyer's representation.
On the second question, the opinion answers no, qualified. Whether Lawyer A may tell Lawyer B of the request turns on ORS 9.460(3) and Oregon RPC 1.6. The potential client's request for a second opinion is information relating to the representation of the client, so Lawyer A cannot reveal it to Lawyer B unless the potential client consents or another RPC 1.6 exception applies.
In practice
The opinion holds that, under Oregon RPC 4.2, the no-contact rule does not reach a lawyer who is sought out by a prospective client for a second opinion, so the lawyer may give it without the existing lawyer's consent. Separately, under RPC 1.6 the fact of the request is confidential information about a (prospective) client, so the lawyer generally may not disclose it to the existing lawyer absent the client's consent or another exception. Verify the current text of Oregon RPC 4.2 and RPC 1.6 before relying on any specific point.
Common questions
Q: Someone with a lawyer asks me for a second opinion. Can I give it?
A: Yes. The opinion concludes RPC 4.2 does not apply when a represented person seeks out a lawyer who is not otherwise representing a client in the matter, so the lawyer may provide a second opinion, including on the propriety of the first lawyer's work.
Q: Should I tell the person's current lawyer that they came to me?
A: Generally no. The opinion concludes the request is information relating to the representation protected by RPC 1.6, so you may not reveal it to the current lawyer unless the client consents or another RPC 1.6 exception applies.
Q: Does the no-contact rule stop me from talking to a represented person at all?
A: Not here. Per the opinion, RPC 4.2 limits a lawyer who is representing a client or their own interests; it does not bar responding to a prospective client who approaches the lawyer for advice.
Background and rules framework
The opinion interprets Oregon RPC 4.2 (communicating with a represented person) and RPC 1.6 (confidentiality), read with ORS 9.460(3), corresponding to Model Rules 4.2 and 1.6. The analysis distinguishes the lawyer who initiates contact while representing a client from the lawyer approached by a prospective client, and treats a second-opinion request as confidential information.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Oregon RPC 4.2 / Model Rule 4.2 (communication with a represented person)
- Oregon RPC 1.6 / Model Rule 1.6 (confidentiality)
Statutes:
- ORS 9.460(3) (duty to maintain client confidences)
Cases:
- State v. Keenan, 307 Or 515, 771 P2d 244 (1989)
Other opinions cited:
- ABA Model Rule 4.2, comment [4] (second opinions for represented persons)
- OSB Formal Ethics Op. No. 2005-23 (client confidences)
See also
- OSB Ethics Op. 2005-80: Contacting a Company's Current and Former Employees
- OSB Ethics Op. 2005-23: Former Lawyer and Client Confidences
Source
- Landing page: https://www.osbar.org/ethics/toc.html
- Original PDF: https://www.osbar.org/_docs/ethics/2005-81.pdf
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2026 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.