OSB November 2018

Can a lawyer take part in a church-organized prepaid legal plan for its members, and contact non-members in person at the church's request to support the church's causes?

Short answer: The opinion concludes a lawyer may join a statute-compliant prepaid plan paid for by a church and may solicit non-members the church identifies, as long as the church does not direct the lawyer's professional judgment, client confidentiality is protected, and any solicitation avoids the means RPC 7.3 prohibits.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2018. Ezel answers yours: whether it's allowed on your facts, under the current Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2018
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A lawyer is asked to join a prepaid legal-services plan that a church would organize and make available to its members, in full compliance with ORS 750.505 to 750.715. The church also asks the lawyer to take on representations for non-members in support of church causes, such as assuring adequate housing and medical services for elderly people, which may require contacting potential clients in person or by phone. The opinion asks whether the lawyer may join the plan and whether the lawyer may contact non-members at the church's request.

On the first question, the opinion answers yes, qualified. Oregon RPC 7.2(b)(2) permits a lawyer to pay the usual charges of a legal-service plan. The lawyer must observe RPC 1.8(f), which allows a third party (the church) to pay for representing clients only with the client's informed consent, no interference with the lawyer's independent judgment or the client-lawyer relationship, and protection of client information under RPC 1.6. RPC 5.4(c) likewise bars the payer from directing the lawyer's professional judgment. The opinion also flags RPC 5.5(a) and ORS 9.160(1): the lawyer must not assist the church in the unauthorized practice of law. As long as RPC 1.8(f) and 5.4(c) are met, the church may pay the lawyer to represent clients other than the church.

On the second question, the opinion also answers yes, qualified. Nothing in the Oregon Rules prevents the lawyer from soliciting employment from non-members, so long as the lawyer does not use any means prohibited by RPC 7.3 (solicitation of someone who cannot exercise reasonable judgment, who has said they do not want to be solicited, or by coercion, duress, or harassment). The opinion states the method does not matter: in-person, telephonic, or other solicitation is governed by the same limits. The lawyer's communications must also comply with RPC 7.1 (no false or misleading communications) and, where advertising, RPC 7.2.

In practice

The opinion holds that, under the Oregon Rules as they stood at the time of the opinion, a lawyer may participate in a church-sponsored prepaid plan and accept the church's payment for representing others, provided the RPC 1.8(f) and RPC 5.4(c) conditions on third-party payment are met and the lawyer does not assist unauthorized practice under RPC 5.5(a). Solicitation of non-members is permitted regardless of method, subject to the RPC 7.3 limits and the RPC 7.1 bar on misleading communications. Verify the current text of Oregon RPC 7.2, 7.3, 1.8, and 5.4 before relying on any specific point.

Common questions

Q: Can I join a prepaid legal plan that a church sets up and pays for?

A: Yes, qualified. The opinion concludes RPC 7.2(b)(2) lets a lawyer take the usual charges of a legal-service plan, and the church may pay for representing members if the RPC 1.8(f) third-party-payment conditions and RPC 5.4(c) are satisfied.

Q: Can the church that pays me tell me how to handle a client's case?

A: No. Per the opinion, RPC 1.8(f) and RPC 5.4(c) require that the payer not interfere with or direct the lawyer's professional judgment or the client-lawyer relationship, and that client information stay protected.

Q: Can I contact non-members in person to support the church's causes?

A: Yes, qualified. The opinion concludes nothing bars soliciting non-members as long as the lawyer avoids the means RPC 7.3 prohibits, and the method (in person, phone, or other) does not change the limits.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Oregon RPC 7.2 (advertising and legal-service plans), RPC 7.3 (solicitation), RPC 7.1 (communications), RPC 1.8(f) (third-party compensation), RPC 5.4(c) (professional independence), and RPC 5.5(a) (assisting unauthorized practice), corresponding to Model Rules 7.2, 7.3, 7.1, 1.8, 5.4, and 5.5. It reads them against ORS 750.505-750.715 (prepaid plans) and ORS 9.160(1) (bar membership to practice).

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Oregon RPC 7.2 / Model Rule 7.2 (advertising; legal-service plans)
  • Oregon RPC 7.3 / Model Rule 7.3 (solicitation)
  • Oregon RPC 7.1 / Model Rule 7.1 (communications)
  • Oregon RPC 1.8(f) / Model Rule 1.8 (third-party compensation)
  • Oregon RPC 5.4(c) / Model Rule 5.4 (professional independence)
  • Oregon RPC 5.5(a) / Model Rule 5.5 (unauthorized practice)

Statutes:

  • ORS 750.505-750.715 (prepaid legal-service plans)
  • ORS 9.160(1) (bar membership required to practice)

See also

Source

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2018 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the rules it relies on.