What political and campaign activities can an Ohio court magistrate take part in, and can a magistrate help the appointing judge's reelection?

Short answer The opinion concluded that magistrates are judicial officers subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct, so a magistrate may not contribute to the campaign committee of a judicial candidate seeking the same court or division to which the magistrate is appointed, may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office, and may not solicit or receive campaign contributions for a party or candidate. A magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party, a nonjudicial candidate, or a judicial candidate running for a different court or division. Campaign work for the appointing judge (going door to door, distributing literature, phone banks, yard signs) is a prohibited public endorsement.
Bar
OHBPC
Issued
August 3, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2018. Ask about yours and see what the current Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2018
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later opinions or rule amendments may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Board answered four questions about a magistrate's political and campaign activities. It started from the premise that full- and part-time magistrates appointed by judges are judicial officers subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct, so Canon 4 restricts their participation in the political process to keep them free from political influence and to protect judicial independence, integrity, and impartiality.

On contributions, the Board explained that a magistrate, like a judge, may generally contribute personal funds to any candidate for public office, with one significant exception: Jud. Cond. R. 4.4(C)(1) bars a judicial candidate's campaign committee from receiving, directly or indirectly, a contribution from any employee of a court the candidate serves or seeks election to, and magistrates are court employees within that prohibition. So a magistrate may contribute (subject to limits) to a judicial candidate running for a different court or division (Jud. Cond. R. 4.4(I)-(J)), and may contribute to a political party without restriction (Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(B)(3)).

On endorsements, the Board held that a magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office, including judicial office (Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(3)), because doing so abuses the prestige of judicial office (Jud. Cond. R. 1.3); examples include allowing one's name on a fundraiser invitation or signing letters in support (In re Keys; Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers). The Board concluded that a personal-funds contribution does not itself constitute a public endorsement. On campaign work, it held that distributing literature door to door, speaking to voters, working a phone bank, or placing yard signs, even for the magistrate's own appointing judge, is public endorsement prohibited under Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(2)-(3), and soliciting or receiving contributions for a candidate or party is likewise prohibited (Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(4)); the appointing court should ensure magistrates are not involved in soliciting campaign funds. The opinion withdrew Advisory Opinions 1990-24 and 2002-13.

In practice

The opinion holds that, under the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct as it stood at the time, a magistrate is a judicial officer bound by Canon 4: the magistrate may not contribute to the campaign committee of a judicial candidate for the same court or division to which the magistrate is appointed, may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate, and may not solicit or receive campaign contributions for a candidate or party. Per the opinion, the magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party, a nonjudicial candidate, or a judicial candidate in a different court or division, and a personal contribution is not itself an endorsement; but campaign work for the appointing judge (door-to-door literature, speaking to voters, phone banks, yard signs) is a prohibited public endorsement.

Common questions

Q: Can a magistrate donate to political candidates?

A: The opinion concluded a magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party, a nonjudicial candidate, or a judicial candidate for a different court or division, but not to a judicial candidate for the court or division to which the magistrate is appointed (Jud. Cond. R. 4.4(C)(1)).

Q: Can a magistrate publicly endorse a candidate?

A: The opinion concluded no; a magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office, including judicial office, under Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(3).

Q: Can a magistrate help the appointing judge's reelection campaign?

A: The opinion concluded no; distributing literature, speaking to voters, working a phone bank, or placing yard signs, even for the appointing judge, is a prohibited public endorsement.

Q: Can a magistrate solicit campaign contributions for others?

A: The opinion concluded no; soliciting or receiving contributions for a candidate or political party is prohibited under Jud. Cond. R. 4.1(A)(4).

Background and rules framework

The opinion interprets Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 4.1 (political and campaign activities of judges and judicial candidates in general) and 4.4 (campaign committees), together with the prestige-of-office limit in Jud. Cond. R. 1.3 and the impartiality/integrity duty in Jud. Cond. R. 1.1, as applied to magistrates as judicial officers under the Code's Application section (Model Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 4).

Citations and references

Rules of Judicial Conduct:

  • Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 4.1 (political and campaign activities), incl. 4.1(A)(2)-(4), 4.1(B)(3) and cmts. [1], [4] (Model Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 4)
  • Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 4.4 (campaign committees), incl. 4.4(C)(1), (I)-(J)
  • Ohio Jud. Cond. R. 1.1, 1.3 (compliance with the law; avoiding abuse of the prestige of judicial office)

Cases:

  • In re Keys, 80 Ohio Misc. 2d 1, 671 N.E.2d 1124 (1996), improper endorsement by a judicial officer
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers, 15 Ohio St.3d 122, 472 N.E.2d 1073 (1984)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill, 103 Ohio St.3d 204, 2004-Ohio-4704, solicitation of campaign funds

Other opinions cited:

  • Ohio BPC Adv. Op. 88-017: personal-funds campaign contributions under the former Code
  • Ohio BPC Adv. Op. 2001-1: judicial officer's spouse placing a yard sign for the spouse's own candidacy

See also

Source

Original opinion text

Reproduced from the official source for research purposes. The linked source is authoritative.

OPINION 2018-04
Issued August 3, 2018
(Withdraws Adv. Op. 1990-24, Adv. Op. 2002-13)

Political and Campaign Activities of Magistrates

SYLLABUS: A magistrate may not make a contribution to the campaign committee of a judicial candidate seeking office to the same court or division of a court to which the magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party, a nonjudicial candidate, or to the campaign committee of judicial candidate who is seeking election to a court or division of the court other than the one to which the magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for any public office, including an incumbent judge or a judicial candidate. A magistrate may not solicit or receive campaign contributions on behalf of a political party or candidate for any public office, including judicial office.

This nonbinding advisory opinion is issued by the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct in response to a prospective or hypothetical question regarding the application of ethics rules applicable to Ohio judges and lawyers. The Ohio Board of Professional Conduct is solely responsible for the content of this advisory opinion, and the advice contained in this opinion does not reflect and should not be construed as reflecting the opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Questions regarding this advisory opinion should be directed to the staff of the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct.
65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.bpc.ohio.gov

DAVID L. DINGWELL
RICHARD A. DOVE
CHAIR
DIRECTOR
SANFORD E. WATSON
D. ALLAN ASBURY
VICE- CHAIR
SENIOR COUNSEL
KRISTI R. MCANAUL
COUNSEL

OPINION 2018-04
Issued August 3, 2018
(Withdraws Adv. Op. 1990-24, Adv. Op. 2002-13)

Political and Campaign Activities of Magistrates

SYLLABUS: A magistrate may not make a contribution to the campaign committee of a judicial candidate seeking office to the same court or division of a court to which the magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party, a nonjudicial candidate, or to the campaign committee of judicial candidate who is seeking election to a court or division of the court other than the one to which the magistrate is appointed. A magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for any public office, including an incumbent judge or a judicial candidate. A magistrate may not solicit or receive campaign contributions on behalf of a political party or candidate for any public office, including judicial office.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED:

1). Whether a magistrate may contribute personal funds to a nonjudicial candidate, a judicial candidate, or a political party.

2). Whether a magistrate may contribute personal funds to a judicial candidate seeking election to another court or to a division of the court other than the division in which the magistrate serves.
Op. 2018-4
2

3). Whether a magistrate may endorse or oppose a candidate for any public office.

4). Whether a magistrate may engage in campaign activities on behalf of his or her appointing judge who is seeking reelection, such as soliciting funds, going door-to-door to speak with voters, distributing campaign literature, placing yard signs, or participating in a telephone bank.

APPLICABLE RULES: Jud.Cond.R. 1.1, 1.3, 4.1, 4.4

OPINION: As judicial officers, both full- and part-time magistrates appointed by judges in municipal, common pleas, or appellate courts are subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Jud.Cond.R., Application. Due to the unique nature of magistrates as judicial officers and public employees, Canon 4 of the Code of Judicial Conduct restricts the ability of a magistrate to participate in the political process. The restrictions in the Code assist magistrates in remaining free from political influence and in upholding and promoting the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judicial branch. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1, cmt. [1], Canon 1, Preamble [2].

Campaign and political contributions

With one significant exception, a magistrate, like a judge, may contribute personal funds to any candidate for public office. The Code expressly prohibits the campaign committee of a judicial candidate from receiving, directly or indirectly, a contribution from any employee of a court on which the candidate serves or to which the candidate is seeking election. Jud.Cond.R. 4.4(C)(1). Because magistrates are court employees, they fall within the scope of the prohibition.

Conversely, a magistrate may contribute personal funds, subject to the contribution limits, to a judicial candidate seeking election to a court or division of a court other than the court to which the magistrate serves. Jud.Cond.R. 4.4(I)-(J). In addition, a magistrate may contribute personal funds to a political party without restriction under the Code of Judicial Conduct. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(B)(3); see Adv. Op. 88-017 (campaign contributions of personal funds permitted under former Code of Judicial Conduct.)
Op. 2018-4
3

Endorsement of candidates for public office

A magistrate may not publicly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office, including judicial office. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(3). Public opposition or endorsement by a magistrate of a candidate for public office abuses the prestige of judicial office held by the magistrate to advance the private interests of others. Jud.Cond.R. 1.3; Jud.Cond.R. 4.1, cmt. [4]. For example, an improper endorsement occurs if a magistrate allows his or her name to be placed on an invitation to a candidate’s fundraiser or signs and mails letters and cards in support of a candidate. In re Keys (1996), 80 Ohio Misc. 2d 1, 671 N.E.2d 1124; Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 122, 472 N.E.2d 1073. In terms of campaign contributions, the Board concludes that a magistrate’s contribution of personal funds to a candidate for public office does not constitute a public endorsement of the candidate.

Participation in campaign activities and solicitation of campaign contributions on behalf of candidates

When a magistrate distributes campaign literature door-to-door, speaks to voters, participates in a campaign phone bank, or places yard signs on behalf of any candidate for public office, including his or her appointing judge, he or she is publicly endorsing the candidate.1 When undertaken by a magistrate, participation in these types of activities demonstrates public approval and support for a candidate, and consequently is prohibited by the Code as an improper endorsement. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(2)-(3). An improper endorsement also occurs if a magistrate solicits or receives contributions from others for or on behalf of a campaign committee of any candidate for public office or a political party. Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(4). The appointing court should ensure that its magistrates are not involved in the receipt or solicitation of campaign fund contributions on behalf of any candidate for judicial or nonjudicial office. See generally, Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill, 103 Ohio St.3d 204, 2004-Ohio-4704.

1 For the circumstance in which a judicial officer’s spouse is a candidate for public office, see Adv. Op. 2001-1 (no violation of Judicial Code if a judicial officer’s spouse places a yard sign supporting the spouse’s candidacy for public office.)
Op. 2018-4
4

CONCLUSION: Magistrates are judicial officers subject to the Code, including the restrictions on political and campaign activities. Because magistrates are also judicial appointees, the Code imposes additional limitations on their political and campaign activities. The Code prohibits the campaign committee of a judicial candidate from receiving, directly or indirectly, a contribution from any employee from the same court or division the candidate serves or is seeking election. However, a magistrate may contribute personal funds to the campaigns of other judicial candidates in other courts or other divisions of a court in which they serve, nonjudicial candidates, or political parties. As a judicial officer, a magistrate may not endorse or oppose any candidate for public office, including his or her incumbent judge. This restriction requires the magistrate to refrain from engaging in campaign activities including, but not limited to, soliciting or receiving campaign contributions on behalf of a political party or candidate for any public office, the distribution of campaign literature, speaking with voters, participating in a campaign phone bank, or placing yard signs on behalf of any candidate for public office.

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2018. Ezel checks the current Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace